Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections with a minimal inhibitory concentration of 2 µg/mL to vancomycin: old (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) versus new (daptomycin or linezolid) agents.
Campbell, Michelle L; Marchaim, Dror; Pogue, Jason M; Sunkara, Bharath; Bheemreddy, Suchitha; Bathina, Pradeep; Pulluru, Harish; Chugh, Neelu; Wilson, Melanie N; Moshos, Judy; Ku, Kimberley; Hayakawa, Kayoko; Martin, Emily T; Lephart, Paul R; Rybak, Michael J; Kaye, Keith S.
Afiliação
  • Campbell ML; Division of Infectious Diseases, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, Harper University Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Ann Pharmacother ; 46(12): 1587-97, 2012 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23212935
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Guidelines recommend that agents other than vancomycin be considered for some types of infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) when the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to vancomycin is 2 µg/mL or more. Alternative therapeutic options include daptomycin and linezolid, 2 relatively new and expensive drugs, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), an old and inexpensive agent.

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the clinical efficacy and potential cost savings associated with use of TMP/SMX compared to linezolid and daptomycin.

METHODS:

A retrospective study was conducted at Detroit Medical Center. For calendar year 2009, unique adults (age >18 years) with infections due to MRSA with an MIC to vancomycin of 2 µg/mL were included if they received 2 or more doses of TMP/SMX and/or daptomycin and/or linezolid. Data were abstracted from patient charts and pharmacy records.

RESULTS:

There were 328 patients included in the study cohort 143 received TMP/SMX alone, 89 received daptomycin alone, 75 received linezolid alone, and 21 patients received a combination of 2 or more of these agents. In univariate analysis, patients who received TMP/SMX alone had significantly better outcomes, including in-hospital (p = 0.003) and 90-day mortality (p < 0.001) compared to patients treated with daptomycin or linezolid. Patients receiving TMP/SMX were also younger (p < 0.001), had fewer comorbid conditions (p < 0.001), had less severe acute severity of illness (p < 0.001), and received appropriate therapy more rapidly (p = 0.001). In multivariate models the association between TMP/SMX treatment and mortality was no longer significant. Antimicrobial cost savings associated with using TMP/SMX averaged $2067.40 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS:

TMP/SMX monotherapy compared favorably to linezolid and daptomycin in terms of treatment efficacy and mortality. Use of TMP/SMX instead of linezolid or daptomycin could potentially significantly reduce antibiotic costs. TMP/SMX should be considered for the treatment of MRSA infection with MIC of 2 µg/mL to vancomycin.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Estafilocócicas / Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina / Antibacterianos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Estafilocócicas / Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina / Antibacterianos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos