Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for evaluating thyroid nodules.
Chen, Bihong T; Jain, Akshay B; Dagis, Andrew; Chu, Peiguo; Vora, Lalit; Maghami, Ellie; Salehian, Behrouz.
Afiliação
  • Chen BT; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
  • Jain AB; Department of Endocrinology, LMC Diabetes and Endocrinology, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Dagis A; Department of Information Science/Biostatistics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
  • Chu P; Department of Pathology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
  • Vora L; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
  • Maghami E; Division of Head and Neck Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
  • Salehian B; Department of Endocrinology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
Endocr Pract ; 21(2): 128-35, 2015 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25297665
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (UG-CNB) is a procedure that is often performed either after repeated inadequate or nondiagnostic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (UG-FNA) or in combination with UG-FNA in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of UG-CNB and UG-FNA for evaluating thyroid nodules.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective study of 350 consecutive patients who had thyroid nodules biopsied by UG-CNB or UG-FNA from January 2007 until November 2011 at our institution. Biopsy results were compared to the surgical specimen pathology reports for the 105 patients who subsequently underwent hemi- or total thyroidectomy in order to determine whether UG-CNB has advantages over UG-FNA for diagnosing thyroid malignancy and neoplasia.

RESULTS:

Out of 461 thyroid nodules biopsied from 350 patients, 365 (79%) involved UG-CNB and 96 (21%) involved UG-FNA. The UG-FNA biopsy group had a significantly higher rate of inadequate sampling than the UG-CNB group (P<.0001; Fisher's exact test). Out of 365 UG-CNB samples, 6 (2%) were deemed inadequate for histologic diagnosis, whereas 26 (27%) of the 96 UG-FNA samples were considered inadequate for cellularity. Comparison of biopsy results with the surgical specimen pathology reports revealed that the diagnostic accuracy of UG-CNB and UG-FNA for detecting malignancy was similar, at 89 and 94%, respectively (not significant by Fisher's exact test). However, the UG-CNB group had a higher detection rate for benign follicular lesions compared to the UG-FNA group (65% versus 48% for UG-FNA; P = .002). Although UG-FNA detected neoplasia with high sensitivity (100%), the specificity was poor (30%). Neither biopsy group had any significant immediate or delayed procedure-related complications.

CONCLUSION:

Our study demonstrated that UG-CNB is safe and is less likely to result in a nondiagnostic biopsy. The accuracy of the UG-CNB technique is similar to that of UG-FNA for detecting thyroid malignancy.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Nódulo da Glândula Tireoide / Ultrassonografia de Intervenção / Biópsia por Agulha Fina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Nódulo da Glândula Tireoide / Ultrassonografia de Intervenção / Biópsia por Agulha Fina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article