Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Maternal Recall Error in Retrospectively Reported Time-to-Pregnancy: an Assessment and Bias Analysis.
Radin, Rose G; Rothman, Kenneth J; Hatch, Elizabeth E; Mikkelsen, Ellen M; Sorensen, Henrik T; Riis, Anders H; Fox, Matthew P; Wise, Lauren A.
Afiliação
  • Radin RG; Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Rothman KJ; Epidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, North Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Hatch EE; Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Mikkelsen EM; RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC.
  • Sorensen HT; Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Riis AH; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Fox MP; Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Wise LA; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol ; 29(6): 576-88, 2015 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26443987
BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies of fecundability often use retrospectively measured time-to-pregnancy (TTP), thereby introducing potential for recall error. Little is known about how recall error affects the bias and precision of the fecundability odds ratio (FOR) in such studies. METHODS: Using data from the Danish Snart-Gravid Study (2007-12), we quantified error for TTP recalled in the first trimester of pregnancy relative to prospectively measured TTP among 421 women who enrolled at the start of their pregnancy attempt and became pregnant within 12 months. We defined recall error as retrospectively measured TTP minus prospectively measured TTP. Using linear regression, we assessed mean differences in recall error by maternal characteristics. We evaluated the resulting bias in the FOR and 95% confidence interval (CI) using simulation analyses that compared corrected and uncorrected retrospectively measured TTP values. RESULTS: Recall error (mean = -0.11 months, 95% CI -0.25, 0.04) was not appreciably associated with maternal age, gravidity, or recent oral contraceptive use. Women with TTP > 2 months were more likely to underestimate their TTP than women with TTP ≤ 2 months (unadjusted mean difference in error: -0.40 months, 95% CI -0.71, -0.09). FORs of recent oral contraceptive use calculated from prospectively measured, retrospectively measured, and corrected TTPs were 0.82 (95% CI 0.67, 0.99), 0.74 (95% CI 0.61, 0.90), and 0.77 (95% CI 0.62, 0.96), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Recall error was small on average among pregnancy planners who became pregnant within 12 months. Recall error biased the FOR of recent oral contraceptive use away from the null by 10%. Quantitative bias analysis of the FOR can help researchers quantify the bias from recall error.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Rememoração Mental / Tempo para Engravidar Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Rememoração Mental / Tempo para Engravidar Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos