Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for classification of (18)F-NaF uptake on PET/CT.
Valadares, Agnes Araujo; Duarte, Paulo Schiavom; Carvalho, Giovanna; Ono, Carla Rachel; Coura-Filho, George Barberio; Sado, Heitor Naoki; Sapienza, Marcelo Tatit; Buchpiguel, Carlos Alberto.
Afiliação
  • Valadares AA; Nuclear Physician, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Duarte PS; PhD, Physician Assistant, Service of Nuclear Medicine - Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo Octavio Frias de Oliveira (Icesp), São Paulo, SP Brazil.
  • Carvalho G; Physician Assistant, Service of Nuclear Medicine - Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo Octavio Frias de Oliveira (Icesp), São Paulo, SP Brazil.
  • Ono CR; PhD, Physician Assistant, Service of Nuclear Medicine - Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo Octavio Frias de Oliveira (Icesp), São Paulo, SP Brazil.
  • Coura-Filho GB; PhD, Physician Assistant, Service of Nuclear Medicine - Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo Octavio Frias de Oliveira (Icesp), São Paulo, SP Brazil.
  • Sado HN; PhD, Physician Assistant, Service of Nuclear Medicine - Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo Octavio Frias de Oliveira (Icesp), São Paulo, SP Brazil.
  • Sapienza MT; Private Docent, Professor, Department of Radiology and Oncology - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP Brazil.
  • Buchpiguel CA; Private Docent, Full Professor, Department of Radiology and Oncology - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP Brazil.
Radiol Bras ; 49(1): 12-6, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26929455
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the cutoff values established by ROC curves to classify (18)F-NaF uptake as normal or malignant. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

PET/CT images were acquired 1 hour after administration of 185 MBq of (18)F-NaF. Volumes of interest (VOIs) were drawn on three regions of the skeleton as follows proximal right humerus diaphysis (HD), proximal right femoral diaphysis (FD) and first vertebral body (VB1), in a total of 254 patients, totalling 762 VOIs. The uptake in the VOIs was classified as normal or malignant on the basis of the radiopharmaceutical distribution pattern and of the CT images. A total of 675 volumes were classified as normal and 52 were classified as malignant. Thirty-five VOIs classified as indeterminate or nonmalignant lesions were excluded from analysis. The standardized uptake value (SUV) measured on the VOIs were plotted on an ROC curve for each one of the three regions. The area under the ROC (AUC) as well as the best cutoff SUVs to classify the VOIs were calculated. The best cutoff values were established as the ones with higher result of the sum of sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS:

The AUCs were 0.933, 0.889 and 0.975 for UD, FD and VB1, respectively. The best SUV cutoffs were 9.0 (sensitivity 73%; specificity 99%), 8.4 (sensitivity 79%; specificity 94%) and 21.0 (sensitivity 93%; specificity 95%) for UD, FD and VB1, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

The best cutoff value varies according to bone region of analysis and it is not possible to establish one value for the whole body.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil