Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety and efficacy of single-stage conversion of failed adjustable gastric band to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a case-control study.
Samakar, Kamran; McKenzie, Travis J; Kaberna, James; Tavakkoli, Ali; Vernon, Ashley H; Madenci, Arin L; Shikora, Scott A; Robinson, Malcolm K.
Afiliação
  • Samakar K; Department of General and GI Surgery, University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo Street, Suite 514, Los Angeles, CA, 90033-4612, USA. kamran.samakar@med.usc.edu.
  • McKenzie TJ; Department of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Kaberna J; Department of General and GI Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Tavakkoli A; Department of General and GI Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Vernon AH; Department of General and GI Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Madenci AL; Department of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Shikora SA; Department of General and GI Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Robinson MK; Department of General and GI Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Surg Endosc ; 30(12): 5453-5458, 2016 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27129555
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We conducted the following study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of single-stage conversion of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) as compared to a cohort of primary LRYGB patients.

METHODS:

A single-institution, prospectively maintained bariatric database was used to retrospectively identify consecutive patients who underwent single-stage removal of LAGB with concomitant conversion to LRYGB between the years of 2007 and 2013. The study cohort was matched 11 for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and approximate date of operation to patients who underwent primary LRYGB. Primary endpoints were operative time, complication rate, length of hospital stay (LOS), and percent excess BMI lost (%EBMIL) at 24-month follow-up.

RESULTS:

Ninety-four conversion patients met inclusion criteria. There were no statistically significant differences in the mean LOS (3.1 vs. 3.0 days, p = 0.97) or the major complication rate (3.2 vs. 1.1 %, p = 0.62) at 30 days postoperatively. Likewise, 30-day minor complication rates, including readmission, were similar between groups (7.5 vs. 6.4 %, p = 0.77). The average operative time was significantly longer for conversion compared to primary LRYGB (193.5 vs. 132 min; p < 0.01). At most recent follow-up after conversion or primary LRYGB, median %EBMIL was 61.3 and 77.3 % (p < 0.01), percent total weight loss was 23.6 and 30.5 % (p < 0.01), and percent change in BMI was 23.4 and 30.5 % (p < 0.01), respectively. Median follow-up time was 17 and 18.6 months after conversion and primary LRYGB, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Single-stage conversion of LAGB to LRYGB is safe with an acceptable complication rate and similar LOS compared to primary LRYGB.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obesidade Mórbida / Derivação Gástrica / Gastroplastia / Laparoscopia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obesidade Mórbida / Derivação Gástrica / Gastroplastia / Laparoscopia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos