Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Irreversible Electroporation to Treat Malignant Tumor Recurrences Within the Pelvic Cavity: A Case Series.
Vroomen, L G P H; Scheffer, H J; Melenhorst, M C A M; van Grieken, N; van den Tol, M P; Meijerink, M R.
Afiliação
  • Vroomen LGPH; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. la.vroomen@vumc.nl.
  • Scheffer HJ; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Melenhorst MCAM; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Grieken N; Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van den Tol MP; Department of Surgical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Meijerink MR; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 40(10): 1631-1640, 2017 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28470395
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To describe the initial experience with irreversible electroporation (IRE) to treat pelvic tumor recurrences.

METHODS:

A retrospective single-center analysis was performed. Adverse events were recorded using Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (CTCAE) 4.0. Clinical outcome was determined using pain- and general- symptom assessment, including Seddon's peripheral nerve injury (PNI) types. Radiological outcome was evaluated by comparing baseline with three-month 18F-FDG PET-CT follow-up.

RESULTS:

Eight patients (nine tumors [recurrences of primary rectal (n = 4), anal (n = 1), sigmoid (n = 1), cervical (n = 1), and renal cell carcinoma (n = 1)]) underwent percutaneous IRE as salvage therapy. Median longest tumor diameter was 3.7 cm (range 1.2-7.0). One CTCAE grade III adverse event (hemorrhage) and eight CTCAE grade II complications occurred in 6/8 patients vagino-tumoral fistula (n = 1), lower limb motor loss (n = 3; PNI type II) with partial recovery in one patient, hypotonic bladder (n = 2; PNI types I and II) with complete recovery in one patient, and upper limb motor loss (n = 2; PNI type II) with partial recovery in both patients. No residual tumor tissue was observed at 3-month follow-up. After a median follow-up of 12 months, local progression was observed in 5/9 lesions (4/5 were >3 cm pre-IRE); one lesion was successfully retreated. Debilitating preprocedural pain (n = 3) remained unchanged (n = 1) or improved (n = 2).

CONCLUSION:

IRE may represent a suitable technique to treat pelvic tumor recurrences, although permanent neural function loss can occur. Complete ablation seems realistic for smaller lesions; for larger lesions symptom control should be the focus.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Neoplasias do Colo Sigmoide / Carcinoma de Células Renais / Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Eletroporação / Neoplasias Renais / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Neoplasias do Colo Sigmoide / Carcinoma de Células Renais / Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Eletroporação / Neoplasias Renais / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda