Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What Families Need and Physicians Deliver: Contrasting Communication Preferences Between Surrogate Decision-Makers and Physicians During Outcome Prognostication in Critically Ill TBI Patients.
Quinn, Thomas; Moskowitz, Jesse; Khan, Muhammad W; Shutter, Lori; Goldberg, Robert; Col, Nananda; Mazor, Kathleen M; Muehlschlegel, Susanne.
Afiliação
  • Quinn T; Department of Neurology (Neurocritical Care), University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Ave North, S-5, Worcester, MA, USA.
  • Moskowitz J; Department of Neurology (Neurocritical Care), University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Ave North, S-5, Worcester, MA, USA.
  • Khan MW; Department of Neurology (Neurocritical Care), University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Ave North, S-5, Worcester, MA, USA.
  • Shutter L; Departments of Critical Care Medicine & Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Goldberg R; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
  • Col N; Shared Decision Making Resources, Georgetown, ME, USA.
  • Mazor KM; Meyers Primary Care Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
  • Muehlschlegel S; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Neurocrit Care ; 27(2): 154-162, 2017 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28685395
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Surrogate decision-makers ("surrogates") and physicians of incapacitated patients have different views of prognosis and how it should be communicated, but this has not been investigated in neurocritically ill patients. We examined surrogates' communication preferences and physicians' practices during the outcome prognostication for critically ill traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) patients in two level-1 trauma centers and seven academic medical centers in the USA.

METHODS:

We used qualitative content analysis and descriptive statistics of transcribed interviews to identify themes in surrogates (n = 16) and physicians (n = 20).

RESULTS:

The majority of surrogates (82%) preferred numeric estimates describing the patient's prognosis, as they felt it would increase prognostic certainty, and limit the uncertainty perceived as frustrating. Conversely, 75% of the physicians reported intentionally omitting numeric estimates during prognostication meetings due to low confidence in family members' abilities to appropriately interpret probabilities, worry about creating false hope, and distrust in the accuracy and data quality of existing TBI outcome models. Physicians felt that these models are for research only and should not be applied to individual patients. Surrogates valued compassion during prognostication discussions, and acceptance of their goals-of-care decision by clinicians. Physicians and surrogates agreed on avoiding false hope.

CONCLUSION:

We identified fundamental differences in the communication preferences of prognostic information between ciTBI patient surrogates and physicians. These findings inform the content of a future decision aid for goals-of-care discussions in ciTBI patients. If validated, these findings may have important implications for improving communication practices in the neurointensive care unit independent of whether a formal decision aid is used.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Relações Profissional-Família / Estado Terminal / Cuidados Críticos / Tomada de Decisões / Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Relações Profissional-Família / Estado Terminal / Cuidados Críticos / Tomada de Decisões / Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos