Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of Ki67 expression for breast cancer subtype classification and prognosis in the Nurses' Health Study.
Healey, Megan A; Hirko, Kelly A; Beck, Andrew H; Collins, Laura C; Schnitt, Stuart J; Eliassen, A Heather; Holmes, Michelle D; Tamimi, Rulla M; Hazra, Aditi.
Afiliação
  • Healey MA; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Hirko KA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Beck AH; Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Collins LC; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Human Medicine, Traverse City Campus, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
  • Schnitt SJ; PathAI, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Eliassen AH; Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Holmes MD; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Tamimi RM; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Hazra A; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 166(2): 613-622, 2017 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28791482
PURPOSE: Ki67 is a proliferation marker commonly assessed by immunohistochemistry in breast cancer, and it has been proposed as a clinical marker for subtype classification, prognosis, and prediction of therapeutic response. However, the clinical utility of Ki67 is limited by the lack of consensus on the optimal cut point for each application. METHODS: We assessed Ki67 by immunohistochemistry using Definiens digital image analysis (DIA) in 2653 cases of incident invasive breast cancer diagnosed in the Nurses' Health Study from 1976 to 2006. Ki67 was scored as continuous percentage of positive tumor cells, and dichotomized at various cut points. Multivariable hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Cox regression models for distant recurrence, breast cancer-specific mortality and overall mortality in relation to luminal subtypes defined with various Ki67 cut points, adjusting for breast cancer prognostic factors, clinico-pathologic features and treatment. RESULTS: DIA was highly correlated with manual scoring of Ki67 (Spearman correlation ρ = 0.86). Mean Ki67 score was higher in grade-defined luminal B (12.6%), HER2-enriched (17.9%) and basal-like (20.6%) subtypes compared to luminal A (8.9%). In multivariable-adjusted models, luminal B tumors had higher breast cancer-specific mortality compared to luminal A cancer classified using various cut points for Ki67 positivity including the 14% cut point routinely reported in the literature (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.11-1.72, p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes for ER- tumors according to Ki67 positivity defined at various cut points. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of Ki67 in breast tumors by DIA was a robust and quantitative method. Results from this large prospective cohort study provide support for the clinical relevance of using Ki67 at the 14% cut point for luminal subtype classification and breast cancer prognosis.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Antígeno Ki-67 Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Antígeno Ki-67 Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos