Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Physician Experiences and Understanding of Genomic Sequencing in Oncology.
Weipert, Caroline M; Ryan, Kerry A; Everett, Jessica N; Yashar, Beverly M; Chinnaiyan, Arul M; Scott Roberts, J; De Vries, Raymond; Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J; Raymond, Victoria M.
Afiliação
  • Weipert CM; Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Ryan KA; Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Everett JN; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5419, USA.
  • Yashar BM; Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Chinnaiyan AM; Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Scott Roberts J; Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • De Vries R; Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Raymond VM; Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Genet Couns ; 27(1): 187-196, 2018 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28840409
The amount of information produced by genomic sequencing is vast, technically complicated, and can be difficult to interpret. Appropriately tailoring genomic information for non-geneticists is an essential next step in the clinical use of genomic sequencing. To initiate development of a framework for genomic results communication, we conducted eighteen qualitative interviews with oncologists who had referred adult cancer patients to a matched tumor-normal tissue genomic sequencing study. In our qualitative analysis, we found varied levels of clinician knowledge relating to sequencing technology, the scope of the tumor genomic sequencing study, and incidental germline findings. Clinicians expressed a perceived need for more genetics education. Additionally, they had a variety of suggestions for improving results reports and possible resources to aid in results interpretation. Most clinicians felt genetic counselors were needed when incidental germline findings were identified. Our research suggests that more consistent genetics education is imperative in ensuring the proper utilization of genomic sequencing in cancer care. Clinician suggestions for results interpretation resources and results report modifications could be used to improve communication. Clinicians' perceived need to involve genetic counselors when incidental germline findings were found suggests genetic specialists could play a critical role in ensuring patients receive appropriate follow-up.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde / Testes Genéticos / Oncologistas / Aconselhamento Genético / Neoplasias Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde / Testes Genéticos / Oncologistas / Aconselhamento Genético / Neoplasias Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos