Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Resin-modified glass ionomer cement vs composite for orthodontic bonding: A multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial.
Benson, Philip E; Alexander-Abt, Jonathan; Cotter, Stephen; Dyer, Fiona M V; Fenesha, Fatma; Patel, Anjli; Campbell, Ciara; Crowley, Niamh; Millett, Declan T.
Afiliação
  • Benson PE; School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom. Electronic address: p.benson@sheffield.ac.uk.
  • Alexander-Abt J; Private practice, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
  • Cotter S; Private practice, Killarney, County Kerry, Republic of Ireland.
  • Dyer FMV; The Orthodontic Centre, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
  • Fenesha F; School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
  • Patel A; Private practice, Crewe, Cheshire, United Kingdom.
  • Campbell C; Cork University Dental School & Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Republic of Ireland.
  • Crowley N; Cork University Dental School & Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Republic of Ireland.
  • Millett DT; Cork University Dental School & Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Republic of Ireland.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 155(1): 10-18, 2019 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30591153
INTRODUCTION: In this study, we aimed to compare the incidence of new demineralized lesions and bond failures between 2 groups of participants wearing fixed orthodontic appliances bonded with either light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer cement or light-cured composite. METHODS: This trial was a multicenter (6 centers: 2 teaching hospitals, 4 specialist orthodontic practices), single-blinded, randomized controlled trial with 2 parallel groups. Patients aged 11 years or older, in the permanent dentition, and about to start fixed orthodontic treatment in these 6 centers were randomly allocated to have either resin-modified glass ionomer cement or light-cured composite for bonding brackets, forward of the first molars. Pretreatment and day-of-debond digital photographic images were taken of the teeth and assessed by up to 5 clinical and 3 lay assessors for the presence or absence of new demineralized lesions and the esthetic impact. The assessors were masked as to group allocation. RESULTS: We randomized 210 participants, and 197 completed the trial. There were 173 with complete before-and after-digital images of the teeth. The incidence of new demineralized lesions was 24%; but when the esthetic impact was taken into account, this was considerably lower (9%). There was no statistically significant difference between the bracket adhesives in the numbers with at least 1 new demineralized lesion (risk ratio,1.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-2.13; P = 0.403) or first-time bracket failure (risk ratio,0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.16; P = 0.35). There were no adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence that the use of resin modified glass ionomer cement over light-cured composite for bonding brackets reduces the incidence of new demineralized lesions or bond failures. There might be other reasons for using resin modified glass ionomer cement. REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.govNCT01925924. PROTOCOL: The protocol is available from the corresponding author on request.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fluoretos Tópicos / Desmineralização do Dente / Braquetes Ortodônticos / Resinas Compostas / Cimentos de Ionômeros de Vidro Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fluoretos Tópicos / Desmineralização do Dente / Braquetes Ortodônticos / Resinas Compostas / Cimentos de Ionômeros de Vidro Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article