Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Body Composition Adjusted Dosing of Gemcitabine-Nab-Paclitaxel in Pancreatic Cancer Does Not Predict Toxicity Compared to Body Surface Area Dosing.
Freckelton, Julia; Croagh, Daniel; Holt, Darcy Quinn; Fox, Adrian; Wong, Rachel; Lee, Margaret; Moore, Gregory Thomas.
Afiliação
  • Freckelton J; a School of Clinical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Monash Health , Monash University , Clayton , Victoria , Australia.
  • Croagh D; a School of Clinical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Monash Health , Monash University , Clayton , Victoria , Australia.
  • Holt DQ; b Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism Unit, Monash Health , Clayton , Victoria , Australia.
  • Fox A; c Department of Medicine , Nursing & Health Science, Monash University , Clayton , Victoria , Australia.
  • Wong R; d Department of Surgery , Eastern Health , Clayton , Victoria , Australia.
  • Lee M; c Department of Medicine , Nursing & Health Science, Monash University , Clayton , Victoria , Australia.
  • Moore GT; e Department of Oncology , Eastern Health , Clayton , Victoria , Australia.
Nutr Cancer ; 71(4): 624-628, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30741000
ABSTRACT
Combination gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (Gem-Nab-P) is a common regimen used to treat metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Toxicity from this regimen is associated with significant morbidity. Currently, Gem-Nab-P is dosed using estimated body surface area, derived from height and weight. This study investigates whether skeletal muscle assessment could be a useful tool in the dosing of Gem-Nab-P in metastatic PDAC. This study included 52 patients who had received first-line treatment with Gem-Nab-P for PDAC. Demographic and chemotherapy treatment information was gathered from medical records and body composition analysis was performed using single slice computed tomography methods, at spinal level L3. Patients who experienced first-cycle chemotherapy-associated toxicity did not have a different median skeletal muscle area (SkMA) to those who did not (128.6 cm2 vs. 111.4 cm2, P = 0.2). There was also no difference in the gemcitabine dose to SkMA ratio (14.1 mg/cm2 vs. 14.4 mg/cm2, P = 0.8), nab-paclitaxel to SkMA ratio (1.8 mg/cm2 vs. 1.8 mg/cm2, P = 0.6) or combined dose equivalent to SkMA ratio (2.8 mg/cm2 vs. 2.9 mg/cm2, P = 0.9) between the patients that experienced first cycle toxicity versus those that did not. This study suggests that a PDAC patient's SkMA is unlikely to be a useful addition to conventional body surface area in the dosing of first-line Gem-Nab-P, to reduce first-cycle toxicity.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Composição Corporal / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Composição Corporal / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália