Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Wireless High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation (10 kHz) Compared with Multiwaveform Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Chronic Pain in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Subjects: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter, Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.
Bolash, Robert; Creamer, Michael; Rauck, Richard; Vahedifar, Payam; Calodney, Aaron; Fox, Ira; Özaktay, Cuneyt; Panchal, Sunil; Vanquathem, Niek; Yasin, Mezaun.
Afiliação
  • Bolash R; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Creamer M; Central Florida Pain Centers, Orlando, Florida.
  • Rauck R; Compass Research LLC, Orlando, Florida.
  • Vahedifar P; Carolina's Pain Institute, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
  • Calodney A; Nuvo Spine and Sports Institute & Ortho Regenerative Center, Beverly Hills, California.
  • Fox I; Precision Spine Care, Tyler, Texas.
  • Özaktay C; Anesthesia Pain Care Consultants, Tamarac, Florida.
  • Panchal S; Anesthesia Pain Care Consultants, Tamarac, Florida.
  • Vanquathem N; National Institute of Pain, Lutz, Florida.
  • Yasin M; Pompano Beach, Florida, USA.
Pain Med ; 20(10): 1971-1979, 2019 10 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30908577
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the wireless Freedom Spinal Cord Stimulator (WSCS) System for the treatment of chronic back and/or leg pain associated with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) refractory to standard medical treatment utilizing 10-kHz stimulation (high-frequency [HF]) in comparison with 10-1,500-Hz stimulation (low-frequency [LF]) waveforms. METHODS: Ninety-nine subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either HF or LF stimulation waveforms utilizing the same Freedom WSCS System. All subjects were implanted with two 8-electrode arrays in the exact same anatomical positions within the dorsal epidural spinal column, with the top electrode positioned at the T8 and T9 vertebrae levels, respectively, and the wireless receiver placed under the skin in a subcutaneous pocket. RESULTS: Seventy-two (HF: N = 38; LF: N = 34) subjects had completed the six-month follow-up after an initial 30-day trial period at the time of this report. For both the HF and LF arms, mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain decreased significantly: 77% and 76%, respectively, for the HF arm and 64% and 64%, respectively, for the LF arm. In addition, most subjects experienced significant improvements in VAS, Oswestry Disability Index, European Quality of Life 5 Dimension questionnaire, Patient Global Impression of Change, and sleep duration. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results demonstrate that WSCS devices can reduce FBSS chronic pain substantially with both LF and HF stimulation waveforms over a seven-month period (30-day trial period and six-month post-trial evaluation).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Lombar / Síndrome Pós-Laminectomia / Tecnologia sem Fio / Estimulação da Medula Espinal Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Lombar / Síndrome Pós-Laminectomia / Tecnologia sem Fio / Estimulação da Medula Espinal Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article