Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-effectiveness analysis of OM-85 vs placebo in the prevention of acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) in children that attend day-care centers.
Berber, Arturo; Del-Rio-Navarro, Blanca Estela.
Afiliação
  • Berber A; Fundación para el Avance de la Ciencia, Oasis 14, CP 02080, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Del-Rio-Navarro BE; Allergy & Immunology Service, Hospital Infantil de Mexico "Federico Gomez", Dr. Marquez 162, CP 06720, Mexico City, Mexico. blancadelrionavarro@gmail.com.
Health Econ Rev ; 9(1): 12, 2019 May 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31065886
BACKGROUND: Children that attend day-care centers frequently contract acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs). ARTIs represent a burden for both children and parents. Systematic reviews on the use of immunostimulants for the prevention of juvenile recurrent ARTIs have provided moderate evidence of efficacy and safety. The aim of the study was to establish whether the immunostimulant, OM-85, was cost-effective in preventing ARTIs in children 2-6 years old that attended day-care centers or preschools in Mexico. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of OM-85. For costs, we assumed an institutional perspective, which included the costs of care and supplies over a study period of six months, during the autumn-winter seasons. We created decision trees and constructed a model to identify pharmacoeconomic parameters. We generated 1000 estimations with the bootstrap method to calculate descriptive statistics of pharmacoeconomic parameters. We evaluated cost-effectiveness compared to treatment without immunostimulants. RESULTS: The mean (SD) incidences of ARTIs were 5.59 ± 0.29 without immunostimulants and 2.97 ± 0.32 with OM-85, during the study period. The mean (25th, 75th percentile) direct costs of ARTIs were 57.04 (37.11, 76.39) US$ (US dollars) without immunostimulants and 48.53 (37.35, 58.93) US$ with OM-85, with a mean increment of - 8.51(- 17.08, 0.75) US$, and a mean cost-effectiveness of - 17.94 (- 36.48, 1.66) US$. The direct costs plus the cost of one parent missing work to care for the child with ARTI were 125.76 (102.83, 150.16) US$, without immunostimulant and 85.21 (72.15, 98.81) US$, with OM-85. The increment was - 40.55 (- 68.29, - 13.95) US$, and the cost-effectiveness was - 86.89 (- 142.37, - 29.34) US$.Part of the cost reduction was ascribed to the reduced use of medications, particularly antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Our results were consistent with previous clinical studies conducted in closed institutions in Mexico. OM-85 reduced the number of ARTIs and the frequency of antibiotics use. We concluded that OM-85 was cost-effective for preventing ARTIs in children that attended day-care centers, particularly when parental absenteeism was covered by the institutions.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: México

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: México