Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improvement of Chemotherapy Solutions Production Procedure in a Hospital Central Chemotherapy Preparation Unit: A Systematic Risk Assessment to Prevent Avoidable Harm in Cancer Patients.
Bourika, Klio; Koutras, Angelos; Kalofonos, Haralambos; Vicha, Anna; Tsiata, Ekaterini; Papadimitriou, Evangelia; Avgoustakis, Konstantinos; Panagi, Zoi.
Afiliação
  • Bourika K; Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
  • Koutras A; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Patras Medical School, University Hospital, Patras, Greece.
  • Kalofonos H; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Patras Medical School, University Hospital, Patras, Greece.
  • Vicha A; University Hospital, Patras, Greece.
  • Tsiata E; Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras Medical School, University Hospital, Patras, Greece.
  • Papadimitriou E; Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
  • Avgoustakis K; Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Technology, Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
  • Panagi Z; Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras Medical School, University Hospital, Patras, Greece.
Clin Med Insights Oncol ; 13: 1179554919852933, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31217699
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study was designed to reevaluate and improve the quality and safety of the chemotherapy preparation in a Central Chemotherapy Preparation Unit of a Public Hospital.

METHODS:

A failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) was conducted by a multidisciplinary team. All potential failure modes at each stage of the chemotherapy preparation were recorded, and the associated risks were scored for their severity, occurrence, and detectability with a risk priority number (RPN). Corrective actions were suggested, and new RPNs were estimated for the modified process.

RESULTS:

Failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis and priority matrix construction, revealed that the partial compliance of Unit's premises with international standards (RPNstage 307), the human errors throughout the compounding (RPNstage 223)-labeling (RPNstage 216)-prescribing (RPNstage 198) steps, and the violation of working protocols by employees (RPNstage 215), were the most important risks for which either urgent or immediate corrective actions had to be taken. Modifying the procedure through the proposed corrective actions is expected to lead to a significant (71.3%) risk containment, with a total RPNpreparation process reduction from 2102 to 604.

CONCLUSIONS:

Failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis and priority matrix development identified and prioritized effectively the risks associated with chemotherapy preparation allowing for the improvement of health services to cancer patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Grécia

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Grécia