Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) improves breast cancer patient setup accuracy.
Kügele, Malin; Mannerberg, Annika; Nørring Bekke, Susanne; Alkner, Sara; Berg, Lovisa; Mahmood, Faisal; Thornberg, Charlotte; Edvardsson, Anneli; Bäck, Sven Å J; Behrens, Claus F; Ceberg, Sofie.
Afiliação
  • Kügele M; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
  • Mannerberg A; Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  • Nørring Bekke S; Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  • Alkner S; Radiotherapy Research Unit, Department of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Berg L; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
  • Mahmood F; Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  • Thornberg C; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
  • Edvardsson A; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark.
  • Bäck SÅJ; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
  • Behrens CF; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
  • Ceberg S; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 20(9): 61-68, 2019 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31478615
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose of the study was to investigate if surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) can decrease setup deviations for tangential and locoregional breast cancer patients compared to conventional laser-based setup (LBS). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Both tangential (63 patients) and locoregional (76 patients) breast cancer patients were enrolled in this study. For LBS, the patients were positioned by aligning skin markers to the room lasers. For the surface based setup (SBS), an optical surface scanning system was used for daily setup using both single and three camera systems. To compare the two setup methods, the patient position was evaluated using verification imaging (field images or orthogonal images).

RESULTS:

For both tangential and locoregional treatments, SBS decreased the setup deviation significantly compared to LBS (P < 0.01). For patients receiving tangential treatment, 95% of the treatment sessions were within the clinical tolerance of ≤ 4 mm in any direction (lateral, longitudinal or vertical) using SBS, compared to 84% for LBS. Corresponding values for patients receiving locoregional treatment were 70% and 54% for SBS and LBS, respectively. No significant difference was observed comparing the setup result using a single camera system or a three camera system.

CONCLUSIONS:

Conventional laser-based setup can with advantage be replaced by surface based setup. Daily SGRT improves patient setup without additional imaging dose to breast cancer patients regardless if a single or three camera system was used.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Braquiterapia / Neoplasias da Mama / Posicionamento do Paciente / Erros de Configuração em Radioterapia / Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suécia

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Braquiterapia / Neoplasias da Mama / Posicionamento do Paciente / Erros de Configuração em Radioterapia / Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suécia