Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Why staff at European schools abstain from enforcing smoke-free policies on persistent violators.
Schreuders, Michael; Linnansaari, Anu; Lindfors, Pirjo; van den Putte, Bas; Kunst, Anton E.
Afiliação
  • Schreuders M; Department of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Linnansaari A; Faculty of Social Sciences, Unit of Health Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
  • Lindfors P; Faculty of Social Sciences, Unit of Health Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
  • van den Putte B; Department of Communication, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Kunst AE; Department of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Health Promot Int ; 35(5): 1106-1115, 2020 Oct 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31652317
Secondary schools in European countries increasingly implement comprehensive smoke-free school policies (SFSPs) that prohibit most or even all adolescents from smoking during school hours. Consistent enforcement of SFSPs is essential for realizing optimum effectiveness. A main challenge represents adolescents who persistently violate the rules. We studied how staff in European countries respond to these persistent violators and why they may turn a blind eye. We used interview transcripts from 69 staff members at 22 schools in 6 European countries to identify cases in which staff turned a blind eye. We then applied thematic analysis for identifying the considerations as to why they turn a blind eye. Turning a blind eye on persistent violators happened among school staff in all six countries. Three considerations were identified. First, staff believe their primary role and duty is to support all adolescents to develop into well-functioning adults, and sometimes it is best to accept smoking. Second, staff expect that applying stricter disciplinary measures will not stop persistent violators and is more likely to create more severe problems. Third, staff do not feel supported by relevant actors in society (e.g. parents) in influencing adolescent smoking. We conclude that staff's considerations stress the need to support school staff in enforcing the increasingly comprehensive rules on the most persistent smokers.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Política Antifumo País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Política Antifumo País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda