Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Incidence and Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Observation of a Chinese Population.
Du, Fang; Zhu, Qifeng; Jiang, Jubo; Chen, Han; Liu, Xianbao; Wang, Jian'an.
Afiliação
  • Du F; Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
  • Zhu Q; Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
  • Jiang J; Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
  • Chen H; Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
  • Liu X; Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
  • Wang J; Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China, wangjianan111@zju.edu.cn.
Cardiology ; 145(1): 27-34, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31722361
AIMS: Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is one of the most common complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We studied the incidence of PPM implantation and identified the predictors in patients who underwent TAVR in a Chinese population. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 256 patients who underwent TAVR with self-expandable valves were included. The incidence of PPM implantation in our study population was 14.8%. In patients who received PPM implantation, the proportion of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients was much lower compared to tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients (18.4 vs. 81.6%, p < 0.05). Patients with BAV were associated with a significantly lower PPM implantation rate and shallower implantation depth compared to patients with TAV (6.4 vs. 21.7% and 4.2 ± 4.4 vs. 6.2 ± 5.0 mm, respectively, p < 0.05 for both). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, prior right bundle branch block (RBBB; OR 8.3, 95% CI 2.2-32.1, p < 0.05), implantation depth (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5, p = 0.01), and TAV (OR 4.7, 95% CI 1.5-14.4, p < 0.05) were independent predictors of PPM implantation after TAVR. There was no difference in 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PPM implantation in patients with self-expandable valves after TAVR was 14.8% in our cohort study. Independent predictors of PPM implantation included prior RBBB, TAV, and implantation depth at the noncoronary sinus side. TAVR in BAV with a supra-annular structure-based sizing strategy might decrease the risk of PPM implantation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Marca-Passo Artificial / Arritmias Cardíacas / Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial / Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Marca-Passo Artificial / Arritmias Cardíacas / Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial / Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China