Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Economic Evaluation of Systemic Treatments for Advanced Melanoma: A Systematic Review.
Gorry, Claire; McCullagh, Laura; Barry, Michael.
Afiliação
  • Gorry C; National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, Ireland. Electronic address: cgorry@stjames.ie.
  • McCullagh L; National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, Ireland; Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Barry M; National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, Ireland; Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Value Health ; 23(1): 52-60, 2020 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31952674
BACKGROUND: Many high cost treatments for advanced melanoma have become available in recent years. National health technology assessment agencies have raised concerns regarding uncertainty in their clinical and cost-effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review is to identify economic evaluations of treatments for advanced melanoma and review model assumptions, outcomes, and quality as preparation for a health technology assessment. METHODS: A search of Embase, MEDLINE, EconLit, and the Cochrane Database was conducted. Only studies using decision-analytic models were included. Two authors independently completed full-text review and data extraction. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were identified. There were major differences in the structural assumptions underpinning the models. There was general agreement in study conclusions, although the predicted costs and quality-adjusted life years for each treatment varied. BRAF monotherapy (vemurafenib, dabrafenib) or BRAF/MEK combination therapy (BRAF monotherapy with cobimetinib or trametinib) has not been shown to be cost-effective in any jurisdiction. PD-1 inhibitors (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) are consistently found to be cost-effective compared with ipilimumab, although their cost-effectiveness compared with chemotherapy is not established. Combination therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab is unlikely to be cost-effective in any setting. One study including all agents found that none of the new treatments were cost-effective relative to chemotherapy. Publication of the study in a health economics journal is associated with better reporting of and higher-quality assessment than those published in clinical journals. CONCLUSION: Despite differences in model structures and assumptions, the conclusions of most included studies were consistent. Health technology assessment has a key role in maximizing value from high-cost innovative treatments. Consideration should be given to divestment from BRAF/MEK inhibitors and ipilimumab in favor of reimbursement of PD-1 inhibitors.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Cutâneas / Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica / Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde / Custos de Medicamentos / Política de Saúde / Melanoma / Antineoplásicos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Cutâneas / Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica / Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde / Custos de Medicamentos / Política de Saúde / Melanoma / Antineoplásicos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article