Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of the dual sodium-glucose linked transporter inhibitor, licogliflozin vs placebo or empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes and heart failure.
de Boer, Rudolf A; Núñez, Julio; Kozlovski, Plamen; Wang, Yi; Proot, Pieter; Keefe, Deborah.
Afiliação
  • de Boer RA; University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Núñez J; Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario Valencia, València, Spain.
  • Kozlovski P; INCLIVA, Universidad de Valencia, CIBER Cardiovascular, Spain.
  • Wang Y; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Proot P; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
  • Keefe D; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 86(7): 1346-1356, 2020 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32068914
AIMS: Explore the efficacy, safety and tolerability of the dual sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT) 1 and 2 inhibitor, licogliflozin in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and heart failure. METHODS: This multicentre, parallel-group phase IIA study randomized 125 patients with T2DM and heart failure (New York Heart Association II-IV; plasma N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP] >300 pg/mL) to licogliflozin (2.5 mg, 10 mg, 50 mg) taken at bedtime, empagliflozin (25 mg) or placebo (44 patients completed the study). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in NT-proBNP after 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline in glycated haemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose, weight, blood pressure, fasting lipid profile, high-sensitivity c-reactive protein, and safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Licogliflozin 10 mg for 12 weeks significantly reduced NT-proBNP vs placebo (Geometric mean ratio 0.56 [95% confidence interval: 0.33, 0.95], P = .033). A trend was observed with 50 mg licogliflozin (0.64 [95% confidence interval: 0.40, 1.03], P = .064), with no difference between licogliflozin and empagliflozin. The largest numerical decreases in glycated haemoglobin were with licogliflozin 50 mg (-0.58 ± 0.34%) and empagliflozin (-0.44 ± 1.18%) vs placebo (-0.04 ± 0.91%). The reduction in body weight was similar with licogliflozin 50 mg (-2.15 ± 2.40 kg) and empagliflozin (-2.25 ± 1.89 kg). A numerical reduction in systolic blood pressure was seen with licogliflozin 50 mg (-9.54 ± 16.88 mmHg) and empagliflozin (-6.98 ± 15.03 mmHg) vs placebo (-2.85 ± 11.97 mmHg). Adverse events (AEs) were mild, including hypotension (6.5%), hypoglycaemia (8.1%) and inadequate diabetes control (1.6%). The incidence of diarrhoea (4.9%) was lower than previously reported. CONCLUSION: The reduction in NT-proBNP with licogliflozin suggests a potential benefit of SGLT1 and 2 inhibition in patients with T2DM and heart failure.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Insuficiência Cardíaca Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Insuficiência Cardíaca Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda