Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Epidemiology of Injuries Sustained by Civilians and Local Combatants in Contemporary Armed Conflict: An Appeal for a Shared Trauma Registry Among Humanitarian Actors.
Wild, Hannah; Stewart, Barclay T; LeBoa, Christopher; Stave, Christopher D; Wren, Sherry M.
Afiliação
  • Wild H; Stanford University School of Medicine, 291 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. hwild@stanford.edu.
  • Stewart BT; Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • LeBoa C; Harborview Injury Research and Prevention Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Stave CD; Department of Epidemiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Wren SM; Lane Medical Library, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
World J Surg ; 44(6): 1863-1873, 2020 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32100067
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Conflict-related injuries sustained by civilians and local combatants are poorly described, unlike injuries sustained by US, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and coalition military personnel. An understanding of injury epidemiology in twenty-first century armed conflict is required to plan humanitarian trauma systems capable of responding to population needs.

METHODS:

We conducted a systematic search of databases (e.g., PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, World Health Organization Catalog, Google Scholar) and grey literature repositories to identify records that described conflict-related injuries sustained by civilians and local combatants since 2001.

RESULTS:

The search returned 3501 records. 49 reports representing conflicts in 18 countries were included in the analysis and described injuries of 58,578 patients. 79.3% of patients were male, and 34.7% were under age 18 years. Blast injury was the predominant mechanism (50.2%), and extremities were the most common anatomic region of injury (33.5%). The heterogeneity and lack of reporting of data elements prevented pooled analysis and limited the generalizability of the results. For example, data elements including measures of injury severity, resource utilization (ventilator support, transfusion, surgery), and outcomes other than mortality (disability, quality of life measures) were presented by fewer than 25% of reports.

CONCLUSIONS:

Data describing the needs of civilians and local combatants injured during conflict are currently inadequate to inform the development of humanitarian trauma systems. To guide system-wide capacity building and quality improvement, we advocate for a humanitarian trauma registry with a minimum set of data elements.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ferimentos e Lesões / Sistema de Registros / Conflitos Armados Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ferimentos e Lesões / Sistema de Registros / Conflitos Armados Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos