Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Polymorphism Influences Response to Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation at Rest.
Shah-Basak, Priyanka; Harvey, Denise Y; Parchure, Shreya; Faseyitan, Olufunsho; Sacchetti, Daniela; Ahmed, Ahmed; Thiam, Abdou; Lohoff, Falk W; Hamilton, Roy H.
Afiliação
  • Shah-Basak P; Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Harvey DY; Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
  • Parchure S; Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Faseyitan O; Research Department, Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA.
  • Sacchetti D; Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Ahmed A; Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Thiam A; Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Lohoff FW; Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Hamilton RH; Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Neuromodulation ; 2020 Oct 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33090650
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The ability of noninvasive brain stimulation to modulate corticospinal excitability and plasticity is influenced by genetic predilections such as the coding for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Otherwise healthy individuals presenting with BDNF Val66Met (Val/Met) polymorphism are less susceptible to changes in excitability in response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and paired associative stimulation paradigms, reflecting reduced neuroplasticity, compared to Val homozygotes (Val/Val). In the current study, we investigated whether BDNF polymorphism influences "baseline" excitability under TMS conditions that are not repetitive or plasticity-inducing. Cross-sectional BDNF levels could predict TMS response more generally because of the ongoing plasticity processes. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Forty-five healthy individuals (23 females; age 25.3 ± 7.0 years) participated in the study, comprising two groups. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) were collected using single-pulse TMS paradigms at fixed stimulation intensities at 110% of the resting motor threshold in one group, and individually-derived intensities based on MEP sizes of 1 mV in the second group. Functional variant Val66Met (rs6265) was genotyped from saliva samples by a technician blinded to the identity of DNA samples.

RESULTS:

Twenty-seven participants (60.0%) were identified with Val/Val, sixteen (35.5%) with Val/Met genotype, and two with Met/Met genotype. MEP amplitudes were significantly diminished in the Val/Met than Val/Val individuals. These results held independent of the single-pulse TMS paradigm of choice (p = 0.017110% group; p = 0.035 1 mV group), age, and scalp-to-coil distances.

CONCLUSIONS:

The findings should be further substantiated in larger-scale studies. If validated, intrinsic differences by BDNF polymorphism status could index response to TMS prior to implementing plasticity-inducing protocols.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos