Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative effectiveness of long-term acute care hospital versus skilled nursing facility transfer.
Makam, Anil N; Nguyen, Oanh Kieu; Miller, Michael E; Shah, Sachin J; Kapinos, Kandice A; Halm, Ethan A.
Afiliação
  • Makam AN; Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. anil.makam@ucsf.edu.
  • Nguyen OK; Department of Population and Data Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. anil.makam@ucsf.edu.
  • Miller ME; Division of Hospital Medicine, Chan Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, USA. anil.makam@ucsf.edu.
  • Shah SJ; Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Kapinos KA; Department of Population and Data Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Halm EA; Division of Hospital Medicine, Chan Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 1032, 2020 Nov 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33176767
BACKGROUND: Long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) use varies considerably across the U.S., which may reflect uncertainty about the effectiveness of LTACHs vs. skilled nursing facilities (SNF), the principal post-acute care alternative. Given that LTACHs provide more intensive care and thus receive over triple the reimbursement of SNFs for comparable diagnoses, we sought to compare outcomes and spending between LTACH versus SNF transfer. METHODS: Using Medicare claims linked to electronic health record (EHR) data from six Texas Hospitals between 2009 and 2010, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized on a medicine service in a high-LTACH use region and discharged to either an LTACH or SNF and followed for one year. The primary outcomes included mortality, 60-day recovery without inpatient care, days at home, and healthcare spending RESULTS: Of 3503 patients, 18% were transferred to an LTACH. Patients transferred to LTACHs were younger (median 71 vs. 82 years), less likely to be female (50.5 vs 66.6%) and white (69.0 vs. 84.1%), but were sicker (24.3 vs. 14.2% for prolonged intensive care unit stay; median diagnosis resource intensity weight of 2.03 vs. 1.38). In unadjusted analyses, patients transferred to an LTACH vs. SNF were less likely to survive (59.1 vs. 65.0%) or recover (62.5 vs 66.0%), and spent fewer days at home (186 vs. 200). Adjusting for demographic and clinical confounders available in Medicare claims and EHR data, LTACH transfer was not significantly associated with differences in mortality (HR, 1.12, 95% CI, 0.94-1.33), recovery (SHR, 1.07, 0.93-1.23), and days spent at home (IRR, 0.96, 0.83-1.10), but was associated with greater Medicare spending ($16,689 for one year, 95% CI, $12,216-$21,162). CONCLUSION: LTACH transfer for Medicare beneficiaries is associated with similar clinical outcomes but with higher healthcare spending compared to SNF transfer. LTACH use should be reserved for patients who require complex inpatient care and cannot be cared for in SNFs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem / Medicare País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem / Medicare País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos