Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bariatric Surgery in Medicare Patients: Examining Safety and Healthcare Utilization in the Disabled and Elderly.
Chao, Grace F; Chhabra, Karan R; Yang, Jie; Thumma, Jyothi R; Arterburn, David E; Ryan, Andrew M; Telem, Dana A; Dimick, Justin B.
Afiliação
  • Chao GF; National Clinician Scholars Program at the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Chhabra KR; Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Yang J; Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Thumma JR; National Clinician Scholars Program at the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Arterburn DE; Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Ryan AM; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Telem DA; Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Dimick JB; Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ann Surg ; 276(1): 133-139, 2022 07 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33214440
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare safety and healthcare utilization after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a national Medicare cohort. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Though bariatric surgery is increasing among Medicare beneficiaries, no long-term, national studies examining comparative effectiveness between procedures exist. Bariatric outcomes are needed for shared decision-making and coverage policy concerns identified by the cMS Medicare Evidence Development and Coverage Advisory Committee.

METHODS:

Retrospective instrumental variable analysis of Medicare claims (2012-2017) for 30,105 bariatric surgery patients entitled due to disability or age. We examined clinical safety outcomes (mortality, complications, and reinterventions), healthcare utilization [Emergency Department (ED) visits, rehospitalizations, and expenditures], and heterogeneity of treatment effect. We compared all outcomes between sleeve and bypass for each entitlement group at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years.

RESULTS:

Among the disabled (n = 21,595), sleeve was associated with lower 3-year mortality [2.1% vs 3.2%, absolute risk reduction (ARR) 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.2% to -0.03%], complications (22.2% vs 27.7%, ARR 95%CI -8.5% to -2.6%), reinterventions (20.1% vs 27.7%, ARR 95%CI -10.7% to -4.6%), ED utilization (71.6% vs 77.1%, ARR 95%CI -8.5% to -2.4%), and rehospitalizations (47.4% vs 52.3%, ARR 95%Ci -8.0% to -1.7%). Cumulative expenditures were $46,277 after sleeve and $48,211 after bypass (P = 0.22). Among the elderly (n = 8510), sleeve was associated with lower 3-year complications (20.1% vs 24.7%, ARR 95%CI -7.6% to -1.7%), reinterventions (14.0% vs 21.9%, ARR 95%CI -10.7% to -5.2%), ED utilization (51.7% vs 57.2%, ARR 95%CI -9.1% to -1.9%), and rehospitalizations (41.8% vs 45.8%, ARR 95%Ci -7.5% to -0.5%). Expenditures were $38,632 after sleeve and $39,270 after bypass (P = 0.60). Procedure treatment effect significantly differed by entitlement for mortality, revision, and paraesophageal hernia repair.

CONCLUSIONS:

Bariatric surgery is safe, and healthcare utilization benefits of sleeve over bypass are preserved across both Medicare elderly and disabled subpopulations.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obesidade Mórbida / Derivação Gástrica / Cirurgia Bariátrica País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obesidade Mórbida / Derivação Gástrica / Cirurgia Bariátrica País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article