Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Active Surveillance for Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma in a Population with Restrictive Diagnostic Workup Strategies.
Loncar, Ivona; van Dijk, Sam P J; Metman, Madelon J H; Lin, Jia Feng; Kruijff, Schelto; Peeters, Robin P; Engelsman, Anton F; van Ginhoven, Tessa M.
Afiliação
  • Loncar I; Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • van Dijk SPJ; Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Metman MJH; Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Lin JF; Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Kruijff S; Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Peeters RP; Department of Internal medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Engelsman AF; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • van Ginhoven TM; Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Thyroid ; 31(8): 1219-1225, 2021 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33430696
Background: The worldwide incidence of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) has increased. Efforts to reduce overtreatment follow two approaches: limiting diagnostic workup of low-risk thyroid nodules and pursuing active surveillance (AS) after diagnosis of microscopic PTC (mPTC). However, most studies on AS have been performed in countries with a relatively high proportion of overdiagnosis and thus incidental mPTC. The role of AS in a population with a restrictive diagnostic workup protocol for imaging and fine-needle aspiration remains unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe the proportion and characteristics of patients with mPTC in the Netherlands and to describe the potential candidates for AS in a situation with restrictive diagnostic protocols since 2007. Methods: All operated patients with an mPTC in the Netherlands between 2005 and 2015 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry database. Three groups were defined: (Group 1) mPTC with preoperative distant or lymph node metastases, (Group 2) mPTC in pathology report after thyroid surgery for another indication, and (Group 3) patients with a preoperative high suspicious thyroid nodule or proven mPTC (Bethesda 5 or 6). Only patients in Group 3 were considered potential candidates for AS. Results: A total of 1018 mPTC patients were identified. Group 1 consisted of 152 patients with preoperatively discovered metastases. Group 2 consisted of 667 patients, of whom 16 (2.4%) had lymph node metastases. There were 199 patients in Group 3, of whom 27 (13.6%) had lymph node metastases. After initial treatment in Group 3, 3.5% (7/199) of the patients had recurrence. Conclusions: Restrictive diagnostic workup strategies of patients with small thyroid nodules lead to limited patients eligible for AS and a higher incidence of lymph node metastases. We believe that there is limited additive value for AS in countries with restrictive diagnostic workup guidelines such as in the Netherlands. However, if an mPTC is encountered, AS can be offered on an individual basis.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide / Carcinoma Papilar / Conduta Expectante País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide / Carcinoma Papilar / Conduta Expectante País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda