Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Disparities in Utilization of Ambulatory Cholecystectomy: Results From Three States.
Janeway, Megan G; Sanchez, Sabrina E; Rosen, Amy K; Patts, Gregory; Allee, Lisa C; Lasser, Karen E; Dechert, Tracey A.
Afiliação
  • Janeway MG; Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Sanchez SE; Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Rosen AK; Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Patts G; Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Allee LC; Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Lasser KE; Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Crosstown Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Dechert TA; Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: tracey.dechert@bmc.org.
J Surg Res ; 266: 373-382, 2021 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34087621
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Inpatient cholecystectomy is associated with higher cost and morbidity relative to ambulatory cholecystectomy, yet the latter may be underutilized by minority and underinsured patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of race, income, and insurance status on receipt of and outcomes following ambulatory cholecystectomy. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Retrospective observational cohort study of patients 18-89 undergoing cholecystectomy for benign indications in Florida, Iowa, and New York, 2011-2014 using administrative databases. The primary outcome of interest was odds of having ambulatory cholecystectomy; secondary outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative complications, and 30-day unplanned admissions following ambulatory cholecystectomy.

RESULTS:

Among 321,335 cholecystectomies, 190,734 (59.4%) were ambulatory and 130,601 (40.6%) were inpatient. Adjusting for age, sex, insurance, income, residential location, and comorbidities, the odds of undergoing ambulatory versus inpatient cholecystectomy were significantly lower in black (aOR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.69, 0.73], P< 0.001) and Hispanic (aOR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.69, 0.72], P< 0.001) patients compared to white patients, and significantly lower in Medicare (aOR = 0.77, 95% CI [0.75, 0.80] P < 0.001), Medicaid (aOR = 0.56, 95% CI [0.54, 0.57], P< 0.001) and uninsured/self-pay (aOR = 0.28, 95% CI [0.27, 0.28], P< 0.001) patients relative to privately insured patients. Patients with Medicaid and those classified as self-pay/uninsured had higher odds of postoperative complications and unplanned admission as did patients with Medicare compared to privately insured individuals.

CONCLUSIONS:

Racial and ethnic minorities and the underinsured have a higher likelihood of receiving inpatient as compared to ambulatory cholecystectomy. The higher incidence of postoperative complications in these patients may be associated with unequal access to ambulatory surgery.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Colecistectomia / Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Colecistectomia / Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article