Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implementing Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients With New Oral Chemotherapy Prescriptions at an Academic Site and a Community Site.
Doolin, Jim W; Berry, Jonathan L; Forbath, Natalia S; Tocci, Noah X; Dechen, Tenzin; Li, Stephanie; Hartwell, Rebekah A; Espiritu, Jennifer K; Roberts, Daniel A; Zerillo, Jessica A; Shea, Meghan.
Afiliação
  • Doolin JW; Division of Hematology-Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
  • Berry JL; Division of Hematology-Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
  • Forbath NS; Center for Healthcare Deliver Science, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
  • Tocci NX; Center for Healthcare Deliver Science, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
  • Dechen T; Center for Healthcare Deliver Science, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
  • Li S; Center for Healthcare Deliver Science, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
  • Hartwell RA; Clovis Oncology, Boulder, CO.
  • Espiritu JK; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
  • Roberts DA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
  • Zerillo JA; Division of Hematology-Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
  • Shea M; Division of Hematology-Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
JCO Clin Cancer Inform ; 5: 631-640, 2021 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34097439
PURPOSE: Oral chemotherapy challenges providers' abilities to safely monitor patients' symptoms, adherence, and financial toxicity. COVID-19 has increased the urgency of caring for patients remotely. Collection of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) has demonstrated efficacy for patients on intravenous chemotherapy, but limited data support their use in oral chemotherapy. We undertook a pilot project to assess the feasibility of implementing an ePRO system for patients starting oral chemotherapy at our cancer center, which includes both an academic site and a community site. METHODS: Patients initiating oral chemotherapy were asked to participate. A five-question tool was built in REDCap. Concerning responses triggered outreach within one business day. The primary outcome was time to first symptom assessment. For comparison, we used a historical cohort of patients who had been prescribed oral chemotherapies by providers in the same disease groups at the cancer center. RESULTS: Twenty-five of 62 (40%) patients completed ePRO assessments. Fifty historical charts were reviewed. Time to first symptom assessment was 7 days (IQR, 4-14 days) in the historical group compared with 3 days (IQR, 2-4 days) in the ePRO group. Time to clinical action was 14 days (7-35 days) in the historical group compared with 8 days (4-19 days) in the ePRO group. No statistically significant differences were detected in 30-day emergency department visit or hospitalization (12% for both groups) or 90-day emergency department visit or hospitalization rates (historical 28% and ePRO 20%). CONCLUSION: An ePRO tool monitoring patient concerns about adherence, cost, and toxicities for patients with new oral chemotherapy regimens is feasible and improves time to symptom assessment. Further investigation is needed to improve patient engagement with ePROs and evaluate the long-term impacts for patients on oral chemotherapy.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente / Antineoplásicos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente / Antineoplásicos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article