Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Monitoring cerebrovascular reactivity in pediatric traumatic brain injury: comparison of three methods.
Abecasis, Francisco; Dias, Celeste; Zakrzewska, Agnieszka; Oliveira, Vitor; Czosnyka, Marek.
Afiliação
  • Abecasis F; Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Faculdade de Medicina, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal. francisco.abecasis@chln.min-saude.pt.
  • Dias C; Intensive Care Department, Neurocritical Care Unit, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
  • Zakrzewska A; Brain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
  • Oliveira V; Laboratory of Cerebral Ultrasound, Neurology Department, Faculdade de Medicina, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Czosnyka M; Brain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Childs Nerv Syst ; 37(10): 3057-3065, 2021 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34212250
PURPOSE: To study three different methods of monitoring cerebral autoregulation in children with severe traumatic brain injury. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of all children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit at a university-affiliated hospital with severe TBI over a 4-year period to study three different methods of monitoring cerebral autoregulation: pressure-reactivity index (PRx), transcranial Doppler derived mean flow velocity index (Mx), and near-infrared spectroscopy derived cerebral oximetry index (COx). RESULTS: Twelve patients were included in the study, aged 5 months to 17 years old. An empirical regression analyzing dependence of PRx on cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) displayed the classic U-shaped distribution, with low PRx values (< 0.3) reflecting intact auto-regulation, within the CPP range of 50-100 mmHg. The optimal CPP was 75-80 mmHg for PRx and COx. The correlation coefficients between the three indices were as follows: PRx vs Mx, r = 0.56; p < 0.0001; PRx vs COx, r = 0.16; p < 0.0001; and COx vs Mx, r = 0.15; p = 0.022. The mean PRx with a cutoff value of 0.3 predicted correctly long-term outcome (p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: PRx seems to be the most robust index to access cerebrovascular reactivity in children with TBI and has promising prognostic value. Optimal CPP calculation is feasible with PRx and COx.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Circulação Cerebrovascular / Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Portugal

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Circulação Cerebrovascular / Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Portugal