Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Enhanced recovery after surgery programs improve short-term outcomes after liver transplantation-A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tinguely, Pascale; Morare, Nolitha; Ramirez-Del Val, Alejandro; Berenguer, Marina; Niemann, Claus U; Pollok, Joerg M; Raptis, Dimitri A; Spiro, Michael.
Afiliação
  • Tinguely P; Clinical Service of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free London Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Morare N; Clinical Service of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free London Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Ramirez-Del Val A; Clinical Service of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free London Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Berenguer M; Liver Unit, Ciberehd, IIS La Fe, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe & Universidad Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
  • Niemann CU; Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Pollok JM; Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Raptis DA; Clinical Service of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free London Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Spiro M; Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Clin Transplant ; 35(11): e14453, 2021 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34382235
This systematic review aimed to investigate the available quality of evidence (QOE) of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for liver transplantation (LT) on short-term outcomes, grade recommendations, and identify relevant components for ERAS protocols. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on short-term outcomes after LT when applying comprehensive ERAS protocols (> 1 ERAS component) versus control groups (CRD42021210374), following the GRADE approach for grading QOE and strength of recommendations. Endpoints were morbidity, mortality, length of stay, and readmission rates after ERAS for LT. Of 858 screened articles, two randomized controlled trials, two prospective, and one retrospective cohort studies were included (2002-2020). Frequent ERAS components were early extubation and postoperative antibiotic, fluid, and nutrition management. Overall complications were reduced in ERAS versus control cohorts (OR .4 (CI .2, .7), with no significant differences in mortality and hospital readmission rates. Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were shorter in ERAS groups (percentage decrease, 55% and 29%, respectively). QOE for individual outcomes was rated moderate to low. ERAS protocols in LT are related to improved short-term outcomes after LT (QOE; Moderate to low | Grade of Recommendation; Strong), but currently lack standardization.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Fígado / Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Fígado / Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article