Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A highly accurate delta check method using deep learning for detection of sample mix-up in the clinical laboratory.
Zhou, Rui; Liang, Yu-Fang; Cheng, Hua-Li; Wang, Wei; Huang, Da-Wei; Wang, Zhe; Feng, Xiang; Han, Ze-Wen; Song, Biao; Padoan, Andrea; Plebani, Mario; Wang, Qing-Tao.
Afiliação
  • Zhou R; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P.R. China.
  • Liang YF; Beijing Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing, P.R. China.
  • Cheng HL; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P.R. China.
  • Wang W; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P.R. China.
  • Huang DW; Department of Blood Transfusion, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P.R. China.
  • Wang Z; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Longfu Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China.
  • Feng X; Inner Mongolia Wesure Date Technology Co., Ltd, Inner Mongolia, P.R. China.
  • Han ZW; Inner Mongolia Wesure Date Technology Co., Ltd, Inner Mongolia, P.R. China.
  • Song B; Inner Mongolia Wesure Date Technology Co., Ltd, Inner Mongolia, P.R. China.
  • Padoan A; Inner Mongolia Wesure Date Technology Co., Ltd, Inner Mongolia, P.R. China.
  • Plebani M; Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
  • Wang QT; Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 60(12): 1984-1992, 2022 11 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34963042
OBJECTIVES: Delta check (DC) is widely used for detecting sample mix-up. Owing to the inadequate error detection and high false-positive rate, the implementation of DC in real-world settings is labor-intensive and rarely capable of absolute detection of sample mix-ups. The aim of the study was to develop a highly accurate DC method based on designed deep learning to detect sample mix-up. METHODS: A total of 22 routine hematology test items were adopted for the study. The hematology test results, collected from two hospital laboratories, were independently divided into training, validation, and test sets. By selecting six mainstream algorithms, the Deep Belief Network (DBN) was able to learn error-free and artificially (intentionally) mixed sample results. The model's analytical performance was evaluated using training and test sets. The model's clinical validity was evaluated by comparing it with three well-recognized statistical methods. RESULTS: When the accuracy of our model in the training set reached 0.931 at the 22nd epoch, the corresponding accuracy in the validation set was equal to 0.922. The loss values for the training and validation sets showed a similar (change) trend over time. The accuracy in the test set was 0.931 and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.977. DBN demonstrated better performance than the three comparator statistical methods. The accuracy of DBN and revised weighted delta check (RwCDI) was 0.931 and 0.909, respectively. DBN performed significantly better than RCV and EDC. Of all test items, the absolute difference of DC yielded higher accuracy than the relative difference for all methods. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that input of a group of hematology test items provides more comprehensive information for the accurate detection of sample mix-up by machine learning (ML) when compared with a single test item input method. The DC method based on DBN demonstrated highly effective sample mix-up identification performance in real-world clinical settings.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aprendizado Profundo Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aprendizado Profundo Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article