Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Iterative Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Recurrent Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Appendix.
Lopez-Ramirez, Felipe; Gushchin, Vadim; Sittig, Michelle; King, Mary Caitlin; Baron, Ekaterina; Nikiforchin, Andrei; Nieroda, Carol; Sardi, Armando.
Afiliação
  • Lopez-Ramirez F; Department of Surgical Oncology, Mercy Medical Center, The Institute for Cancer Care, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Gushchin V; Department of Surgical Oncology, Mercy Medical Center, The Institute for Cancer Care, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Sittig M; Department of Surgical Oncology, Mercy Medical Center, The Institute for Cancer Care, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • King MC; Department of Surgical Oncology, Mercy Medical Center, The Institute for Cancer Care, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Baron E; Department of Surgical Oncology, Mercy Medical Center, The Institute for Cancer Care, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Nikiforchin A; Department of Surgical Oncology, Mercy Medical Center, The Institute for Cancer Care, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Nieroda C; Department of Surgical Oncology, Mercy Medical Center, The Institute for Cancer Care, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Sardi A; Department of Surgical Oncology, Mercy Medical Center, The Institute for Cancer Care, Baltimore, MD, USA. asardi@mdmercy.com.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 29(6): 3390-3401, 2022 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35133518
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Recurrence after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for appendiceal tumors (AT) with mucinous carcinomatosis peritonei (MCP) is common. The evidence favoring iterative procedures (iCRS/HIPEC) is limited, and its benefit is not clear for all patients.

METHODS:

Retrospective (1998-2020) cohorts of AT patients with MCP recurrence after the first CRS/HIPEC were analyzed. Outcomes were compared within tumor grades between iCRS/HIPEC patients and matched control patients without iCRS/HIPEC using propensity score matching (11). Post-recurrence survival (PRS) was measured from the date of recurrence after the first CRS/HIPEC to death or last contact.

RESULTS:

Overall, 55 iCRS/HIPEC patients were identified 36 low-grade (LGMCP) patients, 13 high-grade (HGMCP) patients, and 6 HGMCP patients with signet-ring features (HGMCP-S). Nine patients had a third CRS/HIPEC. The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) scores were 33, 19 and 10, with CC-0/1 achieved for 94.4%, 78.2% and 88.9% of the patients after the first, second, and third CRS/HIPEC, respectively. No 90-day postoperative mortality occurred. The median progression-free survival from the first CRS/HIPEC was 19.7 months for the iCRS/HIPEC patients versus 14.2 months for the matched control patients (p = 0.43). The median PRS was 80.2 months for iCRS/HIPEC versus 36.2 for the control patients (p < 0.001). For the iCRS/HIPEC versus the matched control patients, the median PRS by tumor grade was 174.1 versus 51.9 (p < 0.001) for the LGMCP, 42.0 versus 12.4 (p = 0.02) for the HGMCP, and 15.4 versus 8.1 months (p = 0.61) for the HGMCP-S patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Selected low- and high-grade appendiceal cancer patients with MCP recurrence able to undergo iterative CRS/HIPEC procedures showed favorable outcomes and such patients should be considered for surgery when feasible. This survival benefit with iCRS/HIPEC is not evidenced in recurrent MCP with signet ring cell morphology.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Apêndice / Apêndice / Neoplasias Peritoneais / Adenocarcinoma / Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso / Hipertermia Induzida Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Apêndice / Apêndice / Neoplasias Peritoneais / Adenocarcinoma / Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso / Hipertermia Induzida Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos