Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A novel flexible auxiliary single-arm transluminal endoscopic robot facilitates endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric lesions (with video).
Yang, Xiao-Xiao; Fu, Shi-Chen; Ji, Rui; Li, Li-Xiang; Li, Yan-Qing; Zuo, Xiu-Li.
Afiliação
  • Yang XX; Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, No. 107, Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan, 250012, China.
  • Fu SC; Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, No. 107, Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan, 250012, China.
  • Ji R; Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, No. 107, Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan, 250012, China.
  • Li LX; Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, No. 107, Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan, 250012, China.
  • Li YQ; Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, No. 107, Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan, 250012, China. liyanqing@sdu.edu.cn.
  • Zuo XL; Robot Engineering Laboratory for Precise Diagnosis and Therapy of GI Tumor, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China. liyanqing@sdu.edu.cn.
Surg Endosc ; 36(7): 5510-5517, 2022 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35325289
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Using conventional endoscope to perform endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is difficult because of the one-handed operation and blind dissection caused by gravity. Poor visualization of the submucosal plane causes ESD to be associated with a high risk of bleeding and perforation. This study aimed to develop a novel ESD-assistive robot system and to evaluate its efficacy.

METHODS:

A novel flexible auxiliary single-arm transluminal endoscopic robot (FASTER) was developed. A total of 36 artificial lesions in ex vivo porcine stomachs were removed using the FASTER-assisted ESD method (n = 18) and the conventional ESD method (n = 18). Lesions were 2 cm or 4 cm in diameter, located on the anterior and posterior walls of the antrum. Primary outcome measurements were dissection time and dissection speed.

RESULTS:

The dissection time in FASTER-assisted ESD was significantly shorter than that in conventional ESD (7 min vs 13 min, p = 0.012), mainly because of the faster dissection speed (148.6 vs 97.0 mm2/min, p = 0.002). The total procedure time in FASTER-assisted ESD was shorter than that in conventional ESD, but the difference was not significant (16 min vs 24 min, p = 0.252). Complete en bloc resection was achieved in all lesions. No perforations were detected. The FASTER exhibited the ability of regrasp, multidirectional traction, and proper tension control during ESD.

CONCLUSION:

FASTER significantly increased the dissection speed by providing proper traction and achieving good submucosal vision. This new device is expected to facilitate ESD in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Robótica / Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Robótica / Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China