Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Antimicrobial resistance genes aph(3')-III, erm(B), sul2 and tet(W) abundance in animal faeces, meat, production environments and human faeces in Europe.
Yang, Dongsheng; Heederik, Dick J J; Scherpenisse, Peter; Van Gompel, Liese; Luiken, Roosmarijn E C; Wadepohl, Katharina; Skarzynska, Magdalena; Van Heijnsbergen, Eri; Wouters, Inge M; Greve, Gerdit D; Jongerius-Gortemaker, Betty G M; Tersteeg-Zijderveld, Monique; Portengen, Lützen; Juraschek, Katharina; Fischer, Jennie; Zajac, Magdalena; Wasyl, Dariusz; Wagenaar, Jaap A; Mevius, Dik J; Smit, Lidwien A M; Schmitt, Heike.
Afiliação
  • Yang D; Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Heederik DJJ; Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Scherpenisse P; Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Van Gompel L; Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Luiken REC; Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Wadepohl K; Außenstelle für Epidemiologie, Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
  • Skarzynska M; Department of Microbiology, National Veterinary Research Institute, Pulawy, Poland.
  • Van Heijnsbergen E; Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Wouters IM; Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Greve GD; Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Jongerius-Gortemaker BGM; Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Tersteeg-Zijderveld M; Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Portengen L; Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Juraschek K; Department of Biological Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany.
  • Fischer J; Department of Biological Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany.
  • Zajac M; Department of Microbiology, National Veterinary Research Institute, Pulawy, Poland.
  • Wasyl D; Department of Microbiology, National Veterinary Research Institute, Pulawy, Poland.
  • Wagenaar JA; Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Mevius DJ; Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Smit LAM; Department of Bacteriology and Epidemiology, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
  • Schmitt H; Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 77(7): 1883-1893, 2022 06 29.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35466367
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) is an affordable method to quantify antimicrobial resistance gene (ARG) targets, allowing comparisons of ARG abundance along animal production chains.

OBJECTIVES:

We present a comparison of ARG abundance across various animal species, production environments and humans in Europe. AMR variation sources were quantified. The correlation of ARG abundance between qPCR data and previously published metagenomic data was assessed.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional study was conducted in nine European countries, comprising 9572 samples. qPCR was used to quantify abundance of ARGs [aph(3')-III, erm(B), sul2, tet(W)] and 16S rRNA. Variance component analysis was conducted to explore AMR variation sources. Spearman's rank correlation of ARG abundance values was evaluated between pooled qPCR data and earlier published pooled metagenomic data.

RESULTS:

ARG abundance varied strongly among animal species, environments and humans. This variation was dominated by between-farm variation (pigs) or within-farm variation (broilers, veal calves and turkeys). A decrease in ARG abundance along pig and broiler production chains ('farm to fork') was observed. ARG abundance was higher in farmers than in slaughterhouse workers, and lowest in control subjects. ARG abundance showed a high correlation (Spearman's ρ > 0.7) between qPCR data and metagenomic data of pooled samples.

CONCLUSIONS:

qPCR analysis is a valuable tool to assess ARG abundance in a large collection of livestock-associated samples. The between-country and between-farm variation of ARG abundance could partially be explained by antimicrobial use and farm biosecurity levels. ARG abundance in human faeces was related to livestock antimicrobial resistance exposure.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Anti-Infecciosos / Antibacterianos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Anti-Infecciosos / Antibacterianos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda