Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Randomized Trial of Telephone-Based Smoking Cessation Treatment in the Lung Cancer Screening Setting.
Taylor, Kathryn L; Williams, Randi M; Li, Tengfei; Luta, George; Smith, Laney; Davis, Kimberly M; Stanton, Cassandra A; Niaura, Raymond; Abrams, David; Lobo, Tania; Mandelblatt, Jeanne; Jayasekera, Jinani; Meza, Rafael; Jeon, Jihyoun; Cao, Pianpian; Anderson, Eric D.
Afiliação
  • Taylor KL; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Williams RM; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Li T; Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Luta G; Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Smith L; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Davis KM; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Stanton CA; Behavioral Health, Westat, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Niaura R; School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
  • Abrams D; School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
  • Lobo T; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Mandelblatt J; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Jayasekera J; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Meza R; Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Jeon J; Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Cao P; Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Anderson ED; Department of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 114(10): 1410-1419, 2022 10 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35818122
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Lung cancer mortality is reduced via low-dose computed tomography screening and treatment of early-stage disease. Evidence-based smoking cessation treatment in the lung screening setting can further reduce mortality. We report the results of a cessation trial from the National Cancer Institute's Smoking Cessation at Lung Examination collaboration.

METHODS:

Eligible patients (n = 818) aged 50-80 years were randomly assigned (May 2017-January 2021) to the intensive vs minimal arms (8 vs 3 phone sessions plus 8 vs 2 weeks of nicotine patches, respectively). Bio-verified (primary) and self-reported 7-day abstinence rates were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months post random assignment. Logistic regression analyses evaluated the effects of study arm. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

RESULTS:

Participants reported 48.0 (SD = 17.2) pack-years, and 51.6% were not ready to quit in less than 30 days. Self-reported 3-month quit rates were statistically significantly higher in the intensive vs minimal arm (14.3% vs 7.9%; odds ratio [OR] = 2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.26 to 3.18). Bio-verified abstinence was lower but with similar relative differences between arms (9.1% vs 3.9%; OR = 2.70, 95% CI = 1.44 to 5.08). Compared with the minimal arm, the intensive arm was more effective among those with greater nicotine dependence (OR = 3.47, 95% CI = 1.55 to 7.76), normal screening results (OR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.32 to 5.03), high engagement in counseling (OR = 3.03, 95% CI = 1.50 to 6.14), and patch use (OR = 2.81, 95% CI = 1.39 to 5.68). Abstinence rates did not differ statistically significantly between arms at 6 months (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 0.68 to 2.11) or 12 months (OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 0.82 to 2.42).

CONCLUSIONS:

Delivering intensive telephone counseling and nicotine replacement with lung screening is an effective strategy to increase short-term smoking cessation. Methods to maintain short-term effects are needed. Even with modest quit rates, integrating cessation treatment into lung screening programs may have a large impact on tobacco-related mortality.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abandono do Hábito de Fumar / Neoplasias Pulmonares Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abandono do Hábito de Fumar / Neoplasias Pulmonares Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos