Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Educational interventions to improve ergonomics in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review.
Scaffidi, Michael A; Gimpaya, Nikko; Fecso, Andras B; Khan, Rishad; Li, Juana; Bansal, Rishi; Torabi, Nazi; Shergill, Amandeep K; Grover, Samir C.
Afiliação
  • Scaffidi MA; Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Gimpaya N; Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Fecso AB; Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Khan R; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Li J; Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Bansal R; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Torabi N; Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Shergill AK; Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Grover SC; John P Robarts Library, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Endosc Int Open ; 10(9): E1322-E1327, 2022 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36118639
Background and study aims Endoscopists are at high risk of musculoskeletal pain and injuries (MSPI). Recently, ergonomics has emerged as an area of interest to reduce and prevent the incidence of MSPI in endoscopy. The aim of this systematic review was to determine educational interventions using ergonomic strategies that target reduction of endoscopist MSPI from gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods In December 2020, we conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for articles published from inception to December 16, 2020. Studies were included if they investigated educational interventions aimed at changing knowledge and/or behaviors related to ergonomics in gastrointestinal endoscopy. After screening and full-text review, we extracted data on study design, participants, type of training, and assessment of primary outcomes. We evaluated study quality with the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI). Results Of the initial 575 records identified in the search, five met inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis. We found that most studies (n = 4/5, 80 %) were single-arm interventional studies that were conducted in simulated and/or clinical settings. The most common types of interventions were didactic sessions and/or videos (n = 4/5, 80%). Two (40 %) studies used both standardized assessment studies and formal statistical analyses. The mean MERSQI score was 9.7. Conclusions There is emerging literature demonstrating the effectiveness of interventions to improve ergonomics in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá