Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radiofrequency localization of nonpalpable breast cancer in a multicentre prospective cohort study: feasibility, clinical acceptability, and safety.
Christenhusz, Anke; den Dekker, Bianca M; van Dalen, Thijs; Jongen, Lisa; van der Schaaf, Margreet C; Alic, Lejla; Ten Haken, Bennie; Pijnappel, Ruud M; Dassen, Anneriet E.
Afiliação
  • Christenhusz A; Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente Enschede, Enschede, The Netherlands. anke.christenhusz@mst.nl.
  • den Dekker BM; University of Twente, Magnetic Detection and Imaging Group, Enschede, The Netherlands. anke.christenhusz@mst.nl.
  • van Dalen T; Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Jongen L; Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • van der Schaaf MC; Department of Radiology, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Alic L; Department of Radiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente Enschede, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Ten Haken B; University of Twente, Magnetic Detection and Imaging Group, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Pijnappel RM; University of Twente, Magnetic Detection and Imaging Group, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Dassen AE; Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 201(1): 67-75, 2023 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37322358
PURPOSE: In breast conserving surgery, accurate lesion localization is essential for obtaining adequate surgical margins. Preoperative wire localization (WL) and radioactive seed localization (RSL) are widely accepted methods to guide surgical excision of nonpalpable breast lesions but are limited by logistical challenges, migration issues, and legislative complexities. Radiofrequency identification (RFID) technology may offer a viable alternative. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, clinical acceptability, and safety of RFID surgical guidance for localization of nonpalpable breast cancer. METHODS: In a prospective multicentre cohort study, the first 100 RFID localization procedures were included. The primary outcome was the percentage of clear resection margins and re-excision rate. Secondary outcomes included procedure details, user experience, learningcurve, and adverse events. RESULTS: Between April 2019 and May 2021, 100 women underwent RFID guided breast conserving surgery. Clear resection margins were obtained in 89 out of 96 included patients (92.7%), re-excision was indicated in three patients (3.1%). Radiologists reported difficulties with the placement of the RFID tag, partially related to the relatively large needle-applicator (12-gauge). This led to the premature termination of the study in the hospital using RSL as regular care. The radiologist experience was improved after a manufacturer modification of the needle-applicator. Surgical localization involved a low learning curve. Adverse events (n = 33) included dislocation of the marker during insertion (8%) and hematomas (9%). The majority of adverse events (85%) occurred using the first-generation needle-applicator. CONCLUSION: RFID technology is a potential alternative for non-radioactive and non-wire localization of nonpalpable breast lesions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda