Does primary tumor resection improve survival for patients with sarcomas of pelvic bones, sacrum, and coccyx who have metastasis at diagnosis ?

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrated that primary tumor resection (PTR) improves survival of patients with metastatic bone sarcomas. However, it remains quite unclear regarding the role of PTR in the treatment of sarcomas of pelvic bones with synchronous metastasis at diagnosis. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, we enrolled a total of 385 patients with sarcomas of pelvic bones, sacrum, and coccyx who have metastasis at initial diagnosis, including 139 patients with osteosarcoma, 176 with Ewing sarcoma, and 70 with chondrosarcoma. Association between PTR and disease-specific survival (DSS) were investigated using the univariable and multivariable Cox regression models. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported. Representative institutional PTR strategies and clinical outcomes for patients with metastatic pelvic sarcomas from our cancer center were displayed. RESULTS: The usage rate of PTR was 28.1% (39/139) in osteosarcoma, 13.6% (24/176) in Ewing sarcoma, and 41.4% (29/70) in chondrosarcoma with synchronous metastatic lesions. PTR was not associated with an improved DSS for metastatic pelvic osteosarcoma (HR = 0.686, 95% CI = 0.430 ~ 1.094, P = 0.113) and Ewing sarcoma (HR = 0.580, 95% CI = 0.291 ~ 1.154, P = 0.121). The use of PTR was associated with an improved DSS for metastatic pelvic chondrosarcoma (HR = 0.464, 95% CI = 0.225 ~ 0.954, P = 0.037). CONCLUSION: Primary lesion resection may provide a survival benefit for metastatic chondrosarcoma, but not for osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma of pelvic bones, sacrum, and coccyx. This population-based study recommends an active surgical intervention for metastatic chondrosarcoma while non-surgical treatment for metastatic osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma of the pelvis in terms of survival improvement.