Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Anticoagulation practices for continuous renal replacement therapy: a survey of physicians from the United States.
Boldt, David; Busse, Laurence; Chawla, Lakhmir S; Flannery, Alexander H; Khanna, Ashish; Neyra, Javier A; Palmer, Pamela; Wilson, James; Yessayan, Lenar.
Afiliação
  • Boldt D; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, UCLA Healthcare System and David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Busse L; Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Chawla LS; Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Flannery AH; Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
  • Khanna A; Department of Anesthesiology, Section on Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
  • Neyra JA; Perioperative Outcomes and Informatics Collaborative, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
  • Palmer P; Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Wilson J; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Yessayan L; AcelRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc, San Mateo, CA, USA.
Ren Fail ; 45(2): 2290932, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38073554
BACKGROUND: During continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), anticoagulants are recommended for patients at low risk of bleeding and not already receiving systemic anticoagulants. Current anticoagulants used in CRRT in the US are systemic heparins or regional citrate. To better understand use of anticoagulants for CRRT in the US, we surveyed nephrologists and critical care medicine (CCM) specialists. METHODS: The survey contained 30 questions. Respondents were board certified and worked in intensive care units of academic medical centers or community hospitals. RESULTS: 150 physicians (70 nephrologists and 80 CCM) completed the survey. Mean number of CRRT machines in use increased ∼30% from the pre-pandemic era to 2022. Unfractionated heparin was the most used anticoagulant (43% of estimated patients) followed by citrate (28%). Respondents reported 29% of patients received no anticoagulant. Risk of hypocalcemia (52%) and citrate safety (42%) were the predominant reasons given for using no anticoagulant instead of citrate in heparin-intolerant patients. 84% said filter clogging was a problem when no anticoagulant was used, and almost 25% said increased transfusions were necessary. Respondents using heparin (n = 131) considered it inexpensive and easily obtainable, although of moderate safety, citing concerns of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and bleeding. Anticoagulant citrate dextrose solution was the most used citrate. Respondents estimated that 37% of patients receiving citrate develop hypocalcemia and 17% citrate lock. CONCLUSIONS: Given the increased use of CRRT and the lack of approved, safe, and effective anticoagulant choices for CRRT in the US, effective use of current and other anticoagulant options needs to be evaluated.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Injúria Renal Aguda / Terapia de Substituição Renal Contínua / Hipocalcemia País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Injúria Renal Aguda / Terapia de Substituição Renal Contínua / Hipocalcemia País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos