Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Material flow analysis and global warming potential assessment of an industrial insect-based bioconversion plant using housefly larvae.
Lu, Tao; Lü, Fan; Liao, Nanlin; Chai, Honghui; Zhang, Hua; He, Pinjing.
Afiliação
  • Lu T; Institute of Waste Treatment and Reclamation, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Source Reuse, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
  • Lü F; Institute of Waste Treatment and Reclamation, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Source Reuse, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
  • Liao N; Institute of Waste Treatment and Reclamation, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Source Reuse, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
  • Chai H; Zhejiang Qihe Ecological Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310052, China.
  • Zhang H; Institute of Waste Treatment and Reclamation, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Source Reuse, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
  • He P; Institute of Waste Treatment and Reclamation, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China. Electronic address: solidwaste@tongji.edu.cn.
J Environ Sci (China) ; 139: 483-495, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38105071
ABSTRACT
The significant increase in the demand for biomass waste treatment after garbage classification has led to housefly larvae treatment becoming an attractive treatment option. It can provide a source of protein while treating biomass waste, which means that nutrients can be returned to the natural food chain. However, the performance of this technology in terms of its environmental impacts is still unclear, particularly with regards to global warming potential (GWP).This study used a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach to assess a housefly larvae treatment plant with a treatment capacity of 50 tons of biomass waste per day. The LCA results showed that the 95% confidence intervals for the GWP in summer and winter were determined to be 24.46-32.81 kg CO2 equivalent (CO2-eq)/ton biomass waste and 5.37-10.08 kg CO2-eq/ton biomass waste, respectively. The greater GWP value in summer is due to the longer ventilation time and higher ventilation intensity in summer, which consumes more power. The main GWP contributions are from (1) electricity needs (accounting for 78.6% of emissions in summer and 70.2% in winter) and (2) product substitution by mature housefly larvae and compost (both summer and winter accounting for 96.8% of carbon reduction).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Compostagem / Moscas Domésticas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Compostagem / Moscas Domésticas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China