Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Invasive cervical cancer incidence following bivalent human papillomavirus vaccination: a population-based observational study of age at immunization, dose, and deprivation.
Palmer, Tim J; Kavanagh, Kimberley; Cuschieri, Kate; Cameron, Ross; Graham, Catriona; Wilson, Allan; Roy, Kirsty.
Afiliação
  • Palmer TJ; Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
  • Kavanagh K; MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Cuschieri K; Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
  • Cameron R; Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
  • Graham C; Scottish HPV Reference Laboratory, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Wilson A; Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
  • Roy K; Edinburgh Clinical Research Facility, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Rd S, Edinburgh, UK.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 116(6): 857-865, 2024 Jun 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38247547
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

High-risk human papillomavirus causes cervical cancer. Vaccines have been developed that significantly reduce the incidence of preinvasive and invasive disease. This population-based observational study used linked screening, immunization, and cancer registry data from Scotland to assess the influence of age, number of doses, and deprivation on the incidence of invasive disease following administration of the bivalent vaccine.

METHODS:

Data for women born between January 1, 1988, and June 5, 1996, were extracted from the Scottish cervical cancer screening system in July 2020 and linked to cancer registry, immunization, and deprivation data. Incidence of invasive cervical cancer per 100 000 person-years and vaccine effectiveness were correlated with vaccination status, age at vaccination, and deprivation; Kaplan Meier curves were calculated.

RESULTS:

No cases of invasive cancer were recorded in women immunized at 12 or 13 years of age irrespective of the number of doses. Women vaccinated at 14 to 22 years of age and given 3 doses of the bivalent vaccine showed a significant reduction in incidence compared with all unvaccinated women (3.2/100 000 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.1 to 4.6] vs 8.4 [95% CI = 7.2 to 9.6]). Unadjusted incidence was significantly higher in women from most deprived (Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 1) than least deprived (Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 5) areas (10.1/100 000 [95% CI = 7.8 to 12.8] vs 3.9 [95% CI = 2.6 to 5.7]). Women from the most deprived areas showed a significant reduction in incidence following 3 doses of vaccine (13.1/100 000 [95% CI = 9.95 to 16.9] vs 2.29 [95% CI = 0.62 to 5.86]).

CONCLUSION:

Our findings confirm that the bivalent vaccine prevents the development of invasive cervical cancer and that even 1 or 2 doses 1 month apart confer benefit if given at 12-13 years of age. At older ages, 3 doses are required for statistically significant vaccine effectiveness. Women from more deprived areas benefit more from vaccination than those from less deprived areas.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Infecções por Papillomavirus / Vacinas contra Papillomavirus País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Infecções por Papillomavirus / Vacinas contra Papillomavirus País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido