Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Systematic Review of Conceptualizations and Operationalizations of Youth Polyvictimization.
Radtke, Spenser R; Wretman, Christopher J; Fraga Rizo, Cynthia; Franchino-Olsen, Hannabeth; Williams, Denise Yookong; Chen, Wan-Ting; Macy, Rebecca J.
Afiliação
  • Radtke SR; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
  • Wretman CJ; University of Edinburgh, UK.
  • Fraga Rizo C; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
  • Franchino-Olsen H; The Ohio State University, USA.
  • Williams DY; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
  • Chen WT; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
  • Macy RJ; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Trauma Violence Abuse ; : 15248380231224026, 2024 Jan 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38288502
ABSTRACT
Violence against youth is a global issue impacting millions each year. Increasingly, research has focused on studying those impacted by multiple forms of violence, or polyvictims. Evidence strongly suggests that polyvictimized youth tend to have worse physical and mental health outcomes than those who have experienced single forms of violence. Moreover, minoritized youth (i.e., racial and/or sexual minority youth, youth with disabilities) are more likely to experience polyvictimization, making this a social justice and equity concern. To date, there is no universal consensus on what exactly constitutes polyvictimization. This systematic review aims to examine the ways in which polyvictimization is being studied to inform both research and practice. As such, relevant databases were searched to amass the extant literature related to youth polyvictimization internationally. Empirical studies published since 2006 that focused on youth (under age 18) polyvictimization were included. After the review process, 264 studies met eligibility criteria, however 55 studies employed person-centered/finite mixture analyses and were removed for a separate review, resulting in 209 featured in the current systematic review. Results demonstrate that researchers are defining and operationalizing polyvictimization in different ways (a) using individual victimization event counts; (b) employing domain-based counts; and (c) taking a "highest-victimized" percentage of their sample. The most used measurement tool was the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire, though other validated tools and researcher-constructed questions were frequently utilized. Research on polyvictimization is burgeoning worldwide; however, this research is being conducted in disparate ways, making it difficult to compare findings and further advance the field.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos