Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Real-world experience of Doxorubicin Monotherapy for Advanced or Metastatic Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Single Institutional Study of 16 Cases.
Sato, Ryo; Matsushita, Yuto; Sano, Asuka; Watanabe, Kyohei; Watanabe, Hiromitsu; Tamura, Keita; Motoyama, Daisuke; Otsuka, Atsushi; Miyake, Hideaki.
Afiliação
  • Sato R; Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan; rsato02@hama-med.ac.jp.
  • Matsushita Y; Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
  • Sano A; Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
  • Watanabe K; Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
  • Watanabe H; Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
  • Tamura K; Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
  • Motoyama D; Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
  • Otsuka A; Department of Developed Studies for Advanced Robotic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
  • Miyake H; Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
In Vivo ; 38(4): 1859-1864, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38936944
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/

AIM:

Anthracycline-based chemotherapies including doxorubicin monotherapy are recommended in major guidelines for patients with advanced or metastatic retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS); however, few studies have reported the outcomes of doxorubicin monotherapy for these patients. We herein investigated the oncological efficacy and safety of doxorubicin monotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic RPS in real-world clinical practice. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Sixteen patients diagnosed with advanced or metastatic retroperitoneal sarcoma, receiving doxorubicin monotherapy as first-line treatment between February 2017 and March 2023 at our Institution were analyzed. Response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) periods, overall survival (OS) period, and adverse event (AE) profiles were retrospectively investigated.

RESULTS:

The median age of patients was 69.5 years. Best responses to doxorubicin were as follows complete response, 0 patients (0.0%); partial response, 3 (18.8%); stable disease, 9 (56.3%); and progressive disease, 4 (25.0%). The objective response rate and disease control rate were 18.8 and 75.0%, respectively. During the observation period (median, 22 months, range=2-53 months), median PFS and OS periods were 8.0 and 24.0 months, respectively. The following AEs Grade ≥3 occurred neutropenia in 14 patients (87.5%), febrile neutropenia in 5 (31.3%), leukopenia in 2 (12.5%), thrombocytopenia in 1 (6.3%), and heart failure in 1 (6.3%). Grade ≥3 nausea and vomiting did not occur and there was no treatment-related death.

CONCLUSION:

The oncological outcomes of doxorubicin monotherapy for RPS in real-world clinical practice were not inferior to those of the EORTC trial. The incidence of hematological AEs was higher; however, severe gastrointestinal AEs were prevented by prophylactic antiemetics and there were no treatment-related deaths. Collectively, doxorubicin monotherapy with appropriate prophylactic agents is a valid option for patients with advanced or metastatic RPS.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retroperitoneais / Sarcoma / Doxorrubicina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retroperitoneais / Sarcoma / Doxorrubicina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article