Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Suicide Status Form-4 (SSF-IV) as a potentially therapeutic suicide risk assessment tool.
Oakey-Frost, Nicolas; Moscardini, Emma H; Cowan, Tovah; Gerner, Jessica L; Crapanzano, Kathleen A; Jobes, David A; Tucker, Raymond P.
Afiliação
  • Oakey-Frost N; Department of Psychology, A&M College, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
  • Moscardini EH; McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Cowan T; Department of Psychology, A&M College, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
  • Gerner JL; Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Crapanzano KA; Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Quebec, Canada.
  • Jobes DA; Department of Psychology, A&M College, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
  • Tucker RP; Department of Psychiatry, LSU School of Medicine, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39291637
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Empirically supported suicide risk assessment and conceptualization is a central aim of the Zero Suicide model. The Suicide Status Form (SSF) is the essential document and scaffolding of the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality-Brief Intervention (CAMS-BI) and is hypothesized as an example of a psychological assessment as therapeutic intervention (PATI). However, this hypothesis has never been directly tested.

METHODS:

N = 57 patients deemed at risk for outpatient suicidal behavior and treated as part of an inpatient psychiatric consultation and liaison service were recruited to participate in CAMS-BI at a Level 1 trauma center in the southeastern United States. During the CAMS-BI process, patients were asked to rate their subjective units of distress (SUDS) at five time points throughout the intervention (k = 285).

RESULTS:

The omnibus random intercept multilevel model revealed a significant difference in pre- to post-session ratings of SUDS across patients. Post hoc pairwise comparisons revealed no significant differences between SSF sections (e.g., Section A, Section B, and Section C) and relative reductions in SUDS; however, there was an observable trend toward a favorable effect of Section A of the SSF.

CONCLUSIONS:

The SSF may represent an example of PATI pending replication and extension of the current results.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos