Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol ; 91(2): 191-6, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23771310

ABSTRACT

Mercury toxicity to aquatic organisms was evaluated in different taxonomic groups showing the following species sensitivity gradient: Daphnia magna > Daphnia longispina > Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata > Chlorella vulgaris > Lemna minor > Chironomus riparius. Toxicity values ranged from 3.49 µg/L (48 h-EC50 of D. magna) to 1.58 mg/L (48 h-EC50 of C. riparius). A species sensitivity distribution was used to estimate hazardous mercury concentration at 5 % level (HC5) and the predicted no effect concentration (PNEC). The HC5 was 3.18 µg Hg/L and the PNEC varied between 0.636 and 3.18 µg Hg/L, suggesting no risk of acute toxicity to algae, plants, crustaceans and insects in most freshwaters.


Subject(s)
Aquatic Organisms/drug effects , Mercury/toxicity , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Animals , Araceae/drug effects , Chironomidae/drug effects , Chlorella vulgaris/drug effects , Chlorophyta/drug effects , Daphnia/drug effects , Environmental Monitoring , Fresh Water/chemistry , Mercury/analysis , Risk Assessment , Species Specificity , Toxicity Tests, Acute , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis
2.
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol ; 89(2): 245-50, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22644043

ABSTRACT

Here, mercury kinetics and behavioural effects in the midge larvae under a water-only exposure were assessed. Uptake and elimination of waterborne mercury were described by using a one-compartment kinetic model. Results show that midges were able to readily accumulate the heavy metal (BCF = 450), presenting a fast uptake, up to 13.1 µg Hg g of animal(-1) at the end of the exposure period. Elimination was slow, with c.a. 39 % of the mercury in larvae being depurated after 48 h in clean medium. Behaviour did not present differences upon exposure or elimination, but a trend to increase ventilation was noticed during the exposure period.


Subject(s)
Chironomidae/drug effects , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Mercury/pharmacokinetics , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Animals , Chironomidae/growth & development , Larva/drug effects , Larva/growth & development , Water Pollutants, Chemical/adverse effects
3.
Environ Toxicol Chem ; 41(6): 1451-1458, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35234307

ABSTRACT

In aquatic invertebrate (e.g., daphnids and Artemia sp.) and zebrafish cultures, in ecotoxicological bioassays, or when addressing complex population-level experimental designs, the counting of an organism's progeny is often required. This counting process is laborious, repetitive, and time-consuming, potentially posing health hazards to the operators, and necessarily entailing a higher likelihood of human error. We present an experimental evaluation of a computer-based device for counting neonates (Daphnia magna, Daphnia longispina, and Ceriodaphnia sp.), nauplii (Artemia salina and Artemia franciscana), and zebrafish (Danio rerio) eggs. Manual counts by an experienced technician were compared with the corresponding automated counts achieved by the computer-based counting device. A minimum of 55 counts/species was performed, with the number of counted organisms being up to a maximum of 150 neonates of Ceriodaphnia dubia, 200 neonates of D. magna and D. longispina, 200 nauplii of A. franciscana and A. salina, and 500 zebrafish eggs. Manual and automated counts were both performed in culture medium solutions of 50 ml of volume. Automated counts showed a mean relative acccuracy of 98.9% (97.9%-99.4%) and a relative standard deviation of 1.72%. The results demonstrate that the computer-based device can be used for accurately counting these aquatic organisms. This computer-based counting might be extended to other organisms of similar size, thus facilitating reproduction and life-cycle ecotoxicity tests. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:1451-1458. © 2022 SETAC.


Subject(s)
Cladocera , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Animals , Artemia , Daphnia , Ecotoxicology , Zebrafish
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL