Vitality of autologous retromolar bone grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation after a 3-months healing period: A prospective histomorphometrical analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The incorporation of retromolar bone grafts used for alveolar ridge augmentation is not well understood. This prospective observational study aims to supply histomorphometrical data from bone graft biopsies taken at the time of retrieval and after a 3-month healing period using patient-matched biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 17 patients, trephine biopsies of the graft were acquired at the time of graft retrieval and after a 3-month healing period. The biopsies were compared histomorphometrically regarding the number of osteocytes, appearance of osteocyte lacunae, quantity, surface area, and activity of the Haversian canals. RESULTS: All grafts appeared clinically stable after screw removal and 17 implants were placed. Histomorphometric analysis revealed no significant difference in the number of osteocytes (p = .413), osteocyte lacunae (p = .611), the ratio of filled/empty osteocyte lacunae (p = .467) and active Haversian canals (p = .495) between the biopsies retrieved after a 3-months healing period with those at the time of grafting. The only significant difference was noted in the mean surface area of the Haversian canals (p = .002). Specifically, the grafts post 3-month healing showed a significantly larger mean area (0.069 mm2) compared to the time of grafting (0.029 mm2). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates, compared to other data, a high rate of vital structures in retromolar bone block grafts after 3 months of healing, exhibiting the same histological features in comparison to the biopsies from the native alveolar ridge. Standard histomorphometrical parameters, e.g., the amount of filled or empty osteocyte lacunae for the description of the vitality of the graft need to be reappraised.

The Incidence and Severity of Medication Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws is Similar in Male and Female Mice.

BACKGROUND: Medication related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ), a rare side-effect of antiresorptive medications, is described as exposed bone in the oral cavity that lasts for at least 8 weeks. Most studies report a female predilection for MRONJ; these findings could be due to the increased use of antiresorptives in females, or due to inherent differences between male versus female patients. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the incidence and severity of osteonecrosis of the jaws (ONJ) between male and female mice. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: We designed a randomized in-vivo animal study utilizing male and female mice treated with zoledronic acid (ZA). Experimental periodontitis was induced in 24 male and 24 female mice using a silk ligature following administration of saline or a potent bisphosphonate. After 8 weeks, animals were evaluated radiographically and histologically. INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: The independent variables were sex (male vs female) and treatment group (ZA vs saline control). Treatment was randomly assigned with balanced distribution between male and female animals. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: The main outcome variable was ONJ status coded as present or absent. ONJ was defined as present if there was histologic contact between the ligature and the alveolar bone. Secondary outcomes of interest were radiographic and histologic parameters. ANALYSIS: Statistical differences were analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc test using a P value of 0.05 for significance. RESULTS: The final sample was composed of 24 vehicle treated and 24 ZA treated animals. In vehicle treated animals, 8% of female and 8% of male animals developed ONJ. In ZA treated animals, 83% of female and 92% of male animals developed ONJ. Sex was not associated with the risk (measured as incidence of disease) for developing ONJ or in the radiographic or histologic parameters that were assessed (P values >.1). CONCLUSIONS: Sex does not appear to affect the incidence of MRONJ or the severity of the disease as assessed by the radiographic and histologic parameters.

Bone-Level Tapered Implants for Single Tooth Replacement: Immediate vs Delayed Placement-A Multicenter Randomized Controlled, 1-Year, Non-inferiority Clinical Study.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of immediate and delayed implant placement with bone-level tapered implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this post-market, multicenter prospective randomized controlled study with a primary endpoint of 1 year, 53 patients were randomized to receive either immediate implant placement (test group) or delayed implant placement (control group). The mean crestal bone level changes from implant loading to 12 months postloading were measured using standardized digital periapical radiographs. Changes in facial plate thickness (as measured on CBCT images), implant success and survival, implant stability, soft tissue changes, patient-centered outcomes, and adverse events were measured to assess outcomes between the test and control treatments at 12 months postloading. RESULTS: Of the original 53 patients, 46 patients completed the study (23 in each group). Mean bone changes from loading to the 12-month follow-up were recorded with no statistically significant difference (P = .950) between the groups. The hypothesis was confirmed that immediate implant placement (test) in extraction sockets produces in similar outcomes as delayed placement (control). The test group was found to be similar to the control group (P = .022) in terms of mean changes in facial plate thickness. Implant survival and success were 95.8% in the test group and 92% in the control group. Stability in the control group was superior at the time of surgery, but there was no difference between the groups at implant loading, producing a nonsignificant P value of .563). CONCLUSIONS: This randomized controlled multicenter study showed comparable outcomes 1 year after prosthetic loading in the immediate and delayed implant placement groups.

Self-Assembled Nanocomposite Hydrogels as Carriers for Demineralized Bone Matrix Particles and Enhanced Bone Repair.

Demineralized bone matrix (DBM) has been widely used as an allogeneic alternative to autologous bone graft for bone repair. However, more extensive use of DBM is limited due to its particulate nature after demineralization and rapid particle dispersion following irrigation, resulting in unpredictable osteoinductivity. Here, a new design of injectable hydrogel carriers for DBM that combine self-healing ability and osteogenic properties based on the self-assembly of guanidinylated hyaluronic acid and silica-rich nanoclays is reported. The nanoclays serve as reversible linkages to form a dynamic hydrogel network with the guanidine moieties on the polymer chains. Gelation kinetics and mechanical properties can be controlled by altering nanoclay content in the hydrogel. The resulting hydrogel exerts self-healing ability due to its dynamic crosslinks and well retains its overall performance with high DBM loading. The hydrogel exhibits great cytocompatibility and osteogenic effects mediated by the nanoclays. In vivo delivery of DBM using the nanocomposite hydrogel further demonstrates robust bone regeneration in a mouse calvarial defect model in comparison to DBM delivered with aqueous HA. This work suggests a promising hydrogel platform for many applications including therapeutic delivery and tissue engineering.

Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the pharmacologic management of acute dental pain in adolescents, adults, and older adults: A report from the American Dental Association Science and Research Institute, the University of Pittsburgh, and the University of Pennsylvania.

BACKGROUND: A panel convened by the American Dental Association Science and Research Institute, the University of Pittsburgh, and the University of Pennsylvania conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses and formulated evidence-based recommendations for the pharmacologic management of acute dental pain after simple and surgical tooth extraction(s) and for the temporary management (ie, definitive dental treatment not immediately available) of toothache associated with pulp and periapical diseases in adolescents, adults, and older adults. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: The panel conducted 4 systematic reviews to determine the effect of opioid and nonopioid analgesics, local anesthetics, corticosteroids, and topical anesthetics on acute dental pain. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to assess the certainty of the evidence and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Evidence-to-Decision Framework to formulate recommendations. RESULTS: The panel formulated recommendations and good practice statements using the best available evidence. There is a beneficial net balance favoring the use of nonopioid medications compared with opioid medications. In particular, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs alone or in combination with acetaminophen likely provide superior pain relief with a more favorable safety profile than opioids. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Nonopioid medications are first-line therapy for managing acute dental pain after tooth extraction(s) and the temporary management of toothache. The use of opioids should be reserved for clinical situations when the first-line therapy is insufficient to reduce pain or there is contraindication of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Clinicians should avoid the routine use of just-in-case prescribing of opioids and should exert extreme caution when prescribing opioids to adolescents and young adults.