ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Septoplasty is a crucial step during rhinoplasty to correct the nose function and nasal aesthetics. The idea is not investigated regarding the educational purposes. Objective of the study is to evaluate the efficiency of endoscopic septoplasty during full job rhinoplasty and to observe its educational benefit. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients who submitted for prospective study of endoscopic septorhinoplasty operation; the analysis involves 16 female patients and 11 males. RESULTS: Endoscopic septoplasty during rhinoplasty showed an efficient illumination and visualization, which improved the precision and has an educational benefit during the reform of the posterior septum, isolated septal spurs, anterior septum, and middle turbinate attachments. CONCLUSION: The procedure allows a precise septal job with excellent visualization of the anterior and posterior septum. It also has an intraoperative educational benefit and helps to soothe the time down of patient's recovery.
Subject(s)
Rhinoplasty/methods , Adult , Endoscopy/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Rhinoplasty/education , Treatment Outcome , Turbinates/surgery , Young AdultABSTRACT
Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a heterogeneous disorder with a wide range of validated subjective and objective assessment tools to assess disease severity. However, a comprehensive and easy-to-use tool that integrates these measures for determining disease severity and response to treatment is still obscure. The objective of this study was to develop a standardized assessment tool that facilitates diagnosis, uniform patient monitoring, and comparison of treatment outcomes between different centers both in routine clinical practice and in research. Methods: To develop this tool, published literature on assessment tools was searched on various databases. A panel of 12 steering committee members conducted an advisory board meeting to review the findings. Specific outcome measures to be included in a comprehensive assessment tool and follow-up sheet were then collated following consensus approval from the panel. The tool was further validated for content and revised with expert recommendations to arrive at the finalized Nasal Polyp Patient Assessment Scoring Sheet (N-PASS) tool. Results: The N-PASS tool was developed by integrating the subjective and objective measures for CRS assessment. Based on expert opinions, N-PASS was revised to be used as an easy-to-use guidance tool that captures patient-reported and physician-assessed components for comprehensively assessing disease status and response to treatment. Conclusion: The N-PASS tool can be used to aid in the diagnosis and management of CRS cases with nasal polyps. The tool would also aid in improved monitoring of patients and pave the way for an international disease registry. Level of evidence: Oxford Level 3.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is a highly prevalent and challenging disease to manage. Several systematic reviews (SRs) have been carried out to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biologic therapies. We aimed to evaluate the current and available evidence of the biologics in treating CRSwNP. Data Source: Systematic Review of three electronic databases. Review Methods: Following the PRISMA Statement, the authors explored three main databases through February 2020 for pertinent SRs and meta-analyses (MAs) as well as experimental and observational studies. A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews Version-2 (AMSTAR-2), was employed to evaluate the quality of methodology of SRs and MAs. Results: A Total of five SRs were included in this overview. The AMSTAR-2 final summary was moderate to critically low. Although conflicting findings were reported, anti-immunoglobulin E (Anti-IgE) and anti-interleukin-4 (Anti-IL-4) were superior to placebo for improving total nasal polyp (NP) score, particularly in patients with asthma. Findings of the included reviews revealed that both sinus opacification and the Lund-Mackay (LMK) total scores significantly improved after biologics use. Subjective quality-of-life (QoL) assessment provided by general and specific questionnaires illustrated favorable results of biologics for CRSwNP, whereas no significant adverse events were reported. Conclusion: The current findings support the use of biologics for CRSwNP patients. However, the evidence for their use in such patients should be cautiously adopted because of the questionable evidence. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-022-03144-8.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Piezosurgery, used in different otolaryngology procedures, was a breakthrough in surgery. We systematically reviewed the differences in outcomes after lateral nasal osteotomy with peizosurgery and conventional osteotome and quantified the differences through a meta-analysis. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library databases were selected to search for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published before January 2019 that detailed differences between piezosurgery and conventional osteotomy. The key search terms included "rhinoplasty" and "piezosurgery." Only RCTs in English with patients >18 years who underwent lateral osteotomy by percutaneous or internal approaches were included. PRISMA guidelines were followed in data extraction and study inclusion. Two independent reviewers assessed the relevance of the studies. The point of estimate in the meta-analysis was the standardized mean difference and was pooled with the random-effects model. The measured outcomes were ecchymosis, edema, postoperative pain, and duration of surgery. RESULTS: Five RCTs met our criteria and were analyzed in primary subsequent meta-analyses. Piezosurgery demonstrated significantly lower edema (SMD = -0.75; 95% CI, -1.26, -0.24) and ecchymosis scores (SMD = -0.85; 95% CI, -1.49, -0.20) on postoperative days (POD) 2 or 3 than conventional surgery. They were also significantly lower with piezosurgery than conventional surgery on POD 7 (SMD = -0.64; 95% CI, -1.21, -0.06; and SMD = -0.64; 95% CI, -1.14, -0.14, respectively). Two studies that estimated the degree of pain showed that after piezosurgery, patients experienced lesser pain than after conventional surgery. The mean difference was -0.73 (95% CI, -1.06, -0.39). CONCLUSIONS: Piezosurgery causes less ecchymosis, edema, and pain than conventional osteotomy, without extending the duration of surgery. Laryngoscope, 130:1158-1165, 2020.
Subject(s)
Osteotomy/methods , Piezosurgery , Rhinoplasty/methods , HumansABSTRACT
Background Thyroid noduleshave become relatively common in clinical practice,and their prevalence increases with age. The majority of thyroid nodules are benign, with 5-15% being malignant. There are a number of well-established predictors of malignancy in thyroid nodules, but thyroid nodule size has been a cause for concern for many researchers and results of the studies are still controversial about their probability of malignancy. Up to the current knowledge, there is no published study that evaluates if thyroid nodule size is associated with the risk of malignancy in Saudi Arabia, so in this study, we aim to find that. Methods This is a retrospective study of 987 patients who underwent thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and subsequent thyroidectomy for thyroid nodules measuring ≥ 1 cm. Results Thyroid cancer was more prevalent in males than females, and in patients who were older than or equal to 45 years. Nodular size of 1 - 1.9 cm was more prevalent among cancer patients than in benign cases (p<0.001). Conclusions The highest malignancy risk was observed in nodules <2 cm and no increase in malignancy risk for nodules >2 cm. Nevertheless, when examined by type of thyroid malignancy, the rate of follicular carcinoma and other rare malignancy increased with increasing nodule size.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) negatively affects quality of life (QoL), and balloon catheter sinuplasty (BCS) has shown good outcomes in adult patients. However, there has not been much research on the effects of BCS on pediatric patients. The objective of this review is to systematically assess the literature for studies demonstrating the effectiveness and safety of BCS in pediatric CRS patients. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library. STUDY SELECTION: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis recommendations (PRISMA) to conduct our study. Observational- and interventional-based studies reporting efficacy and/or side effects of BCS among pediatric populations were included. Efficacy was evaluated by clinically reliable measures including Sino-Nasal 5 (SN-5) QoL scale. Antibiotic usage and revision surgery were also evaluated. DATA EXTRACTION: Articles were screened, and data were obtained. Study design, sample size and demographics, treated sinuses, criteria of inclusion, adjunct procedure(s), follow-up time, and outcomes measured were reported. MAIN FINDINGS: Out of 112 articles identified, 10 articles were included: two interventional controlled trials and eight observational studies. All studies evaluating QoL by SN-5 showed a remarkable reduction in SN-5 score postoperatively. Improvement in the computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic findings for up to 1 year after operation was reported. Furthermore, the majority of patinets treated with BCS did not recieve any course of sinusitis-indicated antibiotics during long-term follow-up, and they had low surgical revision rates. Minor side effects were reported, most commonly synechia. CONCLUSION: Available evidence suggests that BCS is safe and effective for the treatment of CRS in pediatric patients. Future randomized controlled studies with large sample size are warranted. Such studies can further determine the efficacy of BCS in managing children with CRS.
Subject(s)
Catheterization , Rhinitis/therapy , Sinusitis/therapy , Adolescent , Catheterization/adverse effects , Catheters , Child , Chronic Disease , Humans , Paranasal SinusesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Biofilms formed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) and Staphylococcus aureus (SA) have been shown to be an important factor in the pathophysiology of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). As well, honey has been used as an effective topical antimicrobial agent for years. Our objective is to determine the in vitro effect of honey against biofilms produced by PA and SA. STUDY DESIGN: In vitro testing of honey against bacterial biofilms. METHODS: We used a previously established biofilm model to assess antibacterial activity of honey against 11 methicillin-susceptible SA (MSSA), 11 methicillin-resistant SA (MRSA), and 11 PA isolates. Honeys were tested against both planktonic and biofilm-grown bacteria. RESULTS: Honey was effective in killing 100 percent of the isolates in the planktonic form. The bactericidal rates for the Sidr and Manuka honeys against MSSA, MRSA, and PA biofilms were 63-82 percent, 73-63 percent, and 91-91 percent, respectively. These rates were significantly higher (P<0.001) than those seen with single antibiotics commonly used against SA. CONCLUSION: Honey, which is a natural, nontoxic, and inexpensive product, is effective in killing SA and PA bacterial biofilms. This intriguing observation may have important clinical implications and could lead to a new approach for treating refractory CRS.
Subject(s)
Biofilms/drug effects , Honey , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , In Vitro Techniques , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Rhinitis/microbiology , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Sinusitis/microbiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The presence of large number of pilgrims during Hajj in Makkah region increases the risk of respiratory diseases. In this study, we aimed to assess the bacteriology of acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) during Hajj season and to demonstrate the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns that should guide the clinicians towards more appropriate antibiotic use. METHODS: Patients with ARS presenting during Hajj season of 2014 were prospectively enrolled. According to EPOS2012 criteria. Sampling of sinus secretions was performed from the middle meatus adjacent to the maxillary sinus ostium via endoscopic guidance. Over all, the study has covered all ENT, emergency and outpatient departments in Hajj. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty six patients with ARS were enrolled in the study. Pathogenic bacteria were identified in 93 (41.2%) patients. Of the 93 patients with bacterial ARS, Staphylococcus aureus was isolated in 46 (49.5%) patients, out of which 13 (28.3%) were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).The second most common group of bacterial isolates was Enterobacteriaceae such as Escherichia coli, and various Klebsiella species. Antibiotic sensitivity showed that methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was also sensitive to cephalosporins, quinolones and clindamycin, while exhibiting relatively less sensitivity rates to amoxicillin-clavulinic acid and macrolides. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the importance of assessing the bacteriology of ARS to help implement guidelines for proper treatment and prevention protocols during Hajj season.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Islam , Rhinitis/epidemiology , Sinusitis/epidemiology , Travel , Acute Disease/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Child , Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Female , Humans , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Rhinitis/microbiology , Rhinitis/prevention & control , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Sinusitis/microbiology , Sinusitis/prevention & control , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare differences between medicated and nonmedicated Merocel middle meatal spacers (MMSs) on sinonasal mucosal healing (histopathologic and endoscopic difference), patient discomfort, and pain on removal of the MMS following functional endoscopic sinus surgery. METHODS: Forty-eight patients with chronic rhinosinusitis undergoing bilateral functional endoscopic sinus surgery were enrolled in a prospective study. Patients were randomized and blinded to receive a medication-soaked Merocel MMS (either one of budesonide, gentamicin, or manuka honey) in one nostril and a nonmedicated Merocel MMS in the contralateral side. Patients were seen on postoperative day 7 and were asked to complete a visual analogue score to report the level of discomfort from nasal packing on each side. Under endoscopic visualization, biopsies of mucosa were taken from both middle meati and assessed by a blinded pathologist to determine the level of mucosal inflammation on a scale of 0 to 4. RESULTS: The budesonide-soaked Merocel MMS showed a trend toward reduced mucosal inflammation when compared to the control Merocel MMS, but the results were not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in the degree of discomfort and pain on the removal of the packings between the medication-soaked Merocel MMS and the nonmedicated Merocel MMS, although there was a trend toward less pain for the manuka honey-soaked Merocel MMS. CONCLUSIONS: Although our study failed to show any significant benefit from the addition of medication to the Merocel MMS, further studies with different compounds are recommended to determine whether a medicated MMS could indeed be a superior alternative to the standard MMS.
Subject(s)
Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Endoscopy/methods , Formaldehyde/administration & dosage , Polyvinyl Alcohol/administration & dosage , Rhinitis/surgery , Sinusitis/surgery , Surgical Sponges , Wound Healing/drug effects , Administration, Topical , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chronic Disease , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hemostatics/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nose , Pain Measurement , Prospective Studies , Sinusitis/complications , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of positive cultures from contaminated nasal cartilage and to demonstrate the effectiveness of antibiotic irrigation as a means of sterilization. DESIGN: A prospective study. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. METHODS: Nasal septal cartilage was harvested during routine endoscopic septoplasties. The harvested cartilage was then dropped on the floor for 60 seconds. The cartilage was then divided into four equal portions, which were then divided into four experimental groups: (1) untreated, (2) normal saline soak for 60 seconds, (3) 40 mg/mL gentamicin solution soak for 60 seconds, and (4) 300 seconds. All specimens were sent for bacterial culture and sensitivity, along with nasal swabs and floor swabs. The incidence of bacterial contamination in the different groups was analyzed using the McNemar hypothesis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation between bacterial culture results and treatments of contaminated nasal septal cartilages. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in this study. Thirty-one percent of the untreated specimens had bacterial contamination. Thirty-one percent of the saline-soaked specimens had significant bacterial growth. Bacterial growth was not observed in any of the specimens treated with gentamicin irrigation for 60 seconds (absolute reduction of 31%); one specimen (3%) in the 300 seconds gentamicin group had a positive culture. A correlation of 70% was observed in the bacterial growth observed in the swab of the operating room floor and the untreated cartilage. CONCLUSIONS: When no other options are available, this study demonstrates that cartilage dropped on the floor can be decontaminated by washing with gentamicin.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Decontamination , Gentamicins/pharmacology , Nasal Cartilages/microbiology , Sterilization , Adult , Female , Floors and Floorcoverings , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Male , Nasal Cartilages/surgery , Operating RoomsABSTRACT
Frontal sinus surgery continues to remain one of the most challenging areas for sinus surgeons. Many different techniques have been introduced for dealing with the frontal sinus. These can range from conservative, mucus membrane-preserving, strictly endoscopic techniques to radical endoscopic and open procedures using drills and burrs to create large openings, all with the aim of keeping the frontal sinus aerated, disease free, and functional in the long-term. This article deals not only with ways in which surgical techniques can be used to minimize or prevent complications in this difficult area but also on how to deal with complications when they occur.