Digital Phenotyping in Adults with Schizophrenia: A Narrative Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As care for older adult patients with schizophrenia lacks innovation, technology can help advance the field. Specifically, digital phenotyping, the real-time monitoring of patients' behaviors through smartphone sensors and symptoms through surveys, holds promise as the method can capture the dynamicity and environmental correlates of disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Few studies have used digital phenotyping to elucidate adult patients' experiences with schizophrenia. In this narrative review, we summarized the literature using digital phenotyping on adults with schizophrenia. No study focused solely on older adult patients. Studies including all adult patients were heterogeneous in measures used, duration, and outcomes. Despite limited research, digital phenotyping shows potential for monitoring outcomes such as negative, positive, and functional symptoms, as well as predicting relapse. Future research should work to target the symptomology persistent in chronic schizophrenia and ensure all patients have the digital literacy required to benefit from digital interventions and homogenize datasets to allow for more robust conclusions.

Characterization and Short-Term Outcome of Potential Celiac Disease in Children.

Background and Objectives: Potential Celiac Disease (PCD) is defined by positive celiac serology without villous atrophy. We aimed to describe the short-term outcome of pediatric PCD while consuming a gluten-containing diet (GCD). Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of pediatric PCD patients continuing GCD, between December 2018-January 2022. Baseline demographics, celiac serology and duodenal biopsy results were reviewed. Follow-up data included repeated serology and biopsy results when performed. Minimum follow-up was 12 months unless celiac disease (CeD) was diagnosed earlier. Results: PCD was diagnosed in 90 children (71% females) with a mean age of 7.2 (range 1.8-16.5) years. Baseline anti-tissue transglutaminase (TTG) levels were above 10 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) in 17/90 (18.9%), 3-10 × ULN in 56/90 (62.2%) and 1-3 × ULN in 17/90 (18.9%). During follow-up, the mean time was 17.6 (range 5-35) months, TTG normalized in 34/90 (37.8%), was stable in 48/90 (53.3%), and increased or remained >10 × ULN in 8/90 (8.9%). In 20/90 (22.2%) patients, a repeat endoscopy was performed, leading to CeD diagnosis in 12/20 (60%). Thus, at the end of follow-up, CeD was diagnosed in 12/90 (13.3%). In patients with TTG >10 × ULN at diagnosis, TTG normalized in 5/17, decreased to 3-10 × ULN in 8/17, and remained above 10 × ULN in 4/17. Conclusions: During the short-term follow-up of pediatric PCD patients, less than 15% progressed to CeD. A third had normalized TTG levels, including children with TTG >10 × ULN, indicating the need for periodic serological and histological follow-up among PCD patients.

Social determinants of mental health in major depressive disorder: Umbrella review of 26 meta-analyses and systematic reviews.

There is a growing recognition of the impact of social determinants of mental health (SDoMHs) on people with, or at risk of, developing serious mental illnesses. Yet it is not known how associations of individual SDoMHs with risk for major depressive disorder (MDD) vary and roughly compare with one another. Following PRISMA guidelines, this umbrella review included 26 meta-analyses and systematic reviews that reported odds ratios, effect sizes, and/or pooled prevalence rates of MDD in samples with versus without specified SDoMHs. Childhood emotional, physical, or sexual abuse and neglect; intimate partner violence in females; and food insecurity were significantly associated with increased risk of MDD, with medium effect sizes. Natural disasters, terrorist acts, and military combat during deployment had small-size adverse effects, and homelessness, incarceration, and migration were associated with significantly elevated prevalence of MDD. Conversely, higher levels of parental care were significantly associated with reduced risk of MDD with medium effect sizes. Evidence supports the use of certain interventions at the individual and community level that can reduce the impact of these factors and promote health, although much more research is warranted in this area along with meaningful healthcare and societal policies to accomplish this goal.

Digital Navigator Training to Increase Access to Mental Health Care in Community-Based Organizations.

Providing human support for users of behavioral health technology can help facilitate the necessary engagement and clinical integration of digital tools in mental health care. A team conducted digital navigator training that taught participants how to promote patrons' digital literacy, evaluate and recommend health apps, and interpret smartphone data. The authors trained 80 participants from 21 organizations, demonstrating this training's feasibility, acceptability, and need. Case studies explore the implementation of this training curriculum. As technology's potential in mental health care expands, training can empower digital navigators to ensure that the use of digital tools is informed, equitable, and clinically relevant.

Current challenges for evaluating mobile health applications.

As mobile health applications continue to proliferate without clear regulation, the need for app evaluation frameworks to offer guidance to patients and clinicians also expands. However, this expanding number of app evaluation frameworks itself can be a source of confusion and often contradictory recommendations. In pursuit of better frameworks that offer innovation for app evaluation, we present 4 challenges that app evaluation frameworks must overcome as well as examples from our own experience toward overcoming them. The recommendations are applicable to all health apps from any field of medicine, although we use examples from mental health as they are illustrative.

An exploratory analysis of the effect size of the mobile mental health Application, mindLAMP.

Objectives: Despite the proliferation of mobile mental health apps, evidence of their efficacy around anxiety or depression is inadequate as most studies lack appropriate control groups. Given that apps are designed to be scalable and reusable tools, insights concerning their efficacy can also be assessed uniquely through comparing different implementations of the same app. This exploratory analysis investigates the potential to report a preliminary effect size of an open-source smartphone mental health app, mindLAMP, on the reduction of anxiety and depression symptoms by comparing a control implementation of the app focused on self-assessment to an intervention implementation of the same app focused on CBT skills. Methods: A total of 328 participants were eligible and completed the study under the control implementation and 156 completed the study under the intervention implementation of the mindLAMP app. Both use cases offered access to the same in-app self-assessments and therapeutic interventions. Multiple imputations were utilized to impute the missing Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 survey scores of the control implementation. Results: Post hoc analysis revealed small effect sizes of Hedge's g = 0.34 for Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 and Hedge's g = 0.21 for Patient Health Questionnaire-9 between the two groups. Conclusions: mindLAMP shows promising results in improving anxiety and depression outcomes in participants. Though our results mirror the current literature in assessing mental health apps' efficacy, they remain preliminary and will be used to inform a larger, well-powered study to further elucidate the efficacy of mindLAMP.

Working towards a ready to implement digital literacy program.

Background: As healthcare continues to expand online and digital care offerings multiply, the importance of digital inclusion and equity is now better recognized. Yet despite impressive regional grassroots efforts, today there remain few readily deployable programs designed to support patient digital literacy. Methods: Digital Outreach for Obtaining Resources and Skills (DOORs) is one such digital literacy program that has evolved over the last 5 years to meet the rising demand. Through community partnerships, the DOORs curriculum and delivery has been updated to make the program more accessible and applicable as Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) changes healthcare. Participants' experience in the most updated iteration of DOORS was assessed through surveys and semi-structured interviews. Results: Improvements to DOORs include an updated DOORs curriculum, updated facilitator manual, an online platform with a learning management system, standardized training, patient-facing educational handouts, consolidation of all DOORs materials into a single package that is ready to be shared with other groups, implementation of a single-session intervention model, and Spanish translation. Participants reported improved confidence on 72% of the digital skills assessed. Thematic analysis resulted in three themes: awareness of divide, patient-centered design, and expanded skills and confidence. Conclusions: Combined, these changes and participant outcomes better position DOORS to meet the rising need for digital literacy and offers a scalable model for teams across the world.

Clinical Considerations for Digital Resources in Care for Patients With Suicidal Ideation.

Smartphone apps offer accessible new tools that may help prevent suicide and that offer support for individuals with active suicidal ideation. Numerous smartphone apps for mental health conditions exist; however, their functionality is limited, and evidence is nascent. A new generation of apps using smartphone sensors and integrating real-time data on evolving risk offers the potential of more personalized support, but these apps present ethical risks and currently remain more in the research domain than in the clinical domain. Nevertheless, clinicians can use apps to benefit patients. This article outlines practical strategies to select safe and effective apps for the creation of a digital toolkit that can augment suicide prevention and safety plans. By creating a unique digital toolkit for each patient, clinicians can help ensure that the apps selected will be most relevant, engaging, and effective.

Parents' long-term experiences in a recreational dance program for their children with autism spectrum disorder.

Background and Aims: Motor impairments are associated with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD); yet few children receive appropriate therapy. Dance interventions are known to have diverse benefits, but research is lacking in how dance can benefit those with ASD. Ballet for all Kids is a novel program that has taught recreational dance classes to those with ASD for over a decade. We aimed to analyze families' experiences in the program over many years, specifically examining why they continue to participate. Methods and Procedure: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 parents and/or legal guardians of long-term participants of Ballet for All Kids. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted to elucidate their experience in the program. Outcomes and Results: In examining the program's retention factors, thematic analysis identified five themes: (1) authentic ballet training, (2) person centered program, (3) sensory integration and self-regulation, (4) skill development, and (5) interpersonal relationships. Conclusions and Implications: Parents' reports add to the literature that dance can benefit participants psychologically, physically, and socially. High retention rates demonstrate the need and desire for a recreational dance program. The authenticity and individualized support of Ballet for All Kids was emphasized by parents and should inform the direction of similar programs.

Standardising the role of a digital navigator in behavioural health: a systematic review.

As the number and availability of digital mental health tools increases, patients and clinicians see benefit only when these tools are engaging and well integrated into care. Digital navigators-ie, members of health-care teams who are dedicated to supporting patient use of digital resources-offer one solution and continue to be piloted in behavioural health; however, little is known about the core features of this position. The aims of this systematic review were to assess how digital navigators are implemented in behavioural health, and to provide a standardised definition of this position. In January, 2023, we conducted a systematic literature search resulting in 48 articles included in this systematic review. Results showed high heterogeneity between four attributes of digital navigators: training specifications, educational background, frequency of communication, and method of communication with patients. Reported effect sizes for depression and anxiety were medium to large, but could not be synthesised due to study heterogeneity and small study sample size. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023391696). Results suggest that digital navigator support can probably increase access to, engagement with, and clinical integration of digital health technology, with standards for training and defined responsibilities now emerging.

Assessing the Food and Drug Administration's Risk-Based Framework for Software Precertification With Top Health Apps in the United States: Quality Improvement Study.

BACKGROUND: As the development of mobile health apps continues to accelerate, the need to implement a framework that can standardize the categorization of these apps to allow for efficient yet robust regulation is growing. However, regulators and researchers are faced with numerous challenges, as apps have a wide variety of features, constant updates, and fluid use cases for consumers. As past regulatory efforts have failed to match the rapid innovation of these apps, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has proposed that the Software Precertification (Pre-Cert) Program and a new risk-based framework could be the solution. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine whether the risk-based framework proposed by the FDA's Pre-Cert Program could standardize categorization of top health apps in the United States. METHODS: In this quality improvement study during summer 2019, the top 10 apps for 6 disease conditions (addiction, anxiety, depression, diabetes, high blood pressure, and schizophrenia) in Apple iTunes and Android Google Play Store in the United States were classified using the FDA's risk-based framework. Data on the presence of well-defined app features, user engagement methods, popularity metrics, medical claims, and scientific backing were collected. RESULTS: The FDA's risk-based framework classifies an app's risk by the disease condition it targets and what information that app provides. Of the 120 apps tested, 95 apps were categorized as targeting a nonserious health condition, whereas only 7 were categorized as targeting a serious condition and 18 were categorized as targeting a critical condition. As the majority of apps targeted a nonserious condition, their risk categorization was largely determined by the information they provided. The apps that were assessed as not requiring FDA review were more likely to be associated with the integration of external devices than those assessed as requiring FDA review (15/58, 26% vs 5/62, 8%; P=.03) and health information collection (24/58, 41% vs 9/62, 15%; P=.008). Apps exempt from the review were less likely to offer health information (25/58, 43% vs 45/62, 72%; P<.001), to connect users with professional care (7/58, 12% vs 14/62, 23%; P=.04), and to include an intervention (8/58, 14% vs 35/62, 55%; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The FDA's risk-based framework has the potential to improve the efficiency of the regulatory review process for health apps. However, we were unable to identify a standard measure that differentiated apps requiring regulatory review from those that would not. Apps exempt from the review also carried concerns regarding privacy and data security. Before the framework is used to assess the need for a formal review of digital health tools, further research and regulatory guidance are needed to ensure that the Pre-Cert Program operates in the greatest interest of public health.