Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Neurosurg Focus ; 46(2): E15, 2019 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30717045

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVEThe development and recent widespread dissemination of flow diverters may have reduced the utilization of surgical bypass procedures to treat complex or giant unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to observe trends in cerebral revascularization procedures for UIAs in the United States before and after the introduction of flow diverters by using the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS).METHODSThe authors extracted data from the NIS database for the years 1998-2015 using the ICD-9/10 diagnostic and procedure codes. Patients with a primary diagnosis of UIA with a concurrent bypass procedure were included in the study. Outcomes and hospital charges were analyzed.RESULTSA total of 216,212 patients had a primary diagnosis of UIA during the study period. The number of patients diagnosed with a UIA increased by 128% from 1998 (n = 7718) to 2015 (n = 17,600). Only 1328 of the UIA patients (0.6%) underwent cerebral bypass. The percentage of patients who underwent bypass in the flow diverter era (2010-2015) remained stable at 0.4%. Most patients who underwent bypass were white (51%), were female (62%), had a median household income in the 3rd or 4th quartiles (57%), and had private insurance (51%). The West (33%) and Midwest/North Central regions (30%) had the highest volume of bypasses, whereas the Northeast region had the lowest (15%). Compared to the period 1998-2011, bypass procedures for UIAs in 2012-2015 shifted entirely to urban teaching hospitals (100%) and to an elective basis (77%). The median hospital stay (9 vs 3 days, p < 0.0001), median hospital charges ($186,746 vs $66,361, p < 0.0001), and rate of any complication (51% vs 17%, p < 0.0001) were approximately threefold higher for the UIA patients with bypass than for those without bypass.CONCLUSIONSDespite a significant increase in the diagnosis of UIAs over the 17-year study period, the proportion of bypass procedures performed as part of their treatment has remained stable. Therefore, advances in endovascular aneurysm therapy do not appear to have affected the volume of bypass procedures performed in the UIA population. The authors' findings suggest a potentially ongoing niche for bypass procedures in the contemporary treatment of UIAs.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Revascularization/trends , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Health Care Costs/trends , Intracranial Aneurysm/epidemiology , Intracranial Aneurysm/surgery , Length of Stay/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cerebral Revascularization/economics , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intracranial Aneurysm/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
2.
World Neurosurg ; 131: e116-e127, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31323403

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to compare the health care utilization and outcomes after surgery for anterior cranial fossa skull base meningioma (AFM), middle cranial fossa skull base meningioma (MFM), and posterior cranial fossa skull base meningioma (PFM) across the United States. METHODS: We queried the MarketScan database using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Current Procedural Terminology 4, from 2000 to 2016. We included adult patients who had at least 24 months of enrollment after the surgical procedure. The outcome of interest was length of hospital stay, disposition, complications, and reoperation after the procedure. RESULTS: A cohort of 1191 patients was identified from the database. Less than half of patients (43.66%) were in the AFM cohort, 32.24% were in the MFM cohort, and only 24.1% were in the PFM cohort. Patients who underwent surgery for PFM had longer hospital stay (P = 0.0009), high complication rate (P = 0.0011), and less likely to be discharged home (P = 0.0013) during index hospitalization. There were no differences in overall payments at 12 months and 24 months among the cohorts. There was no significant difference in 90-day median payments among the groups ($66,212 [AFM] vs. $65,602 [MFM] and $71,837 [PFM]; P = 0.198). Male gender, commercial insurance (compared with Medicare), and higher comorbidity scores (score 3 compared with score 0) were associated with higher 90-day payments in the PFM cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Overall payments (at 12 months and 24 months) and 90-day payments were not different among the cohorts. Patients with PFM had longer hospital stay and higher complication rate and were less likely to be discharged home with higher utilization of outpatient services at 12 months and 24 months.


Subject(s)
Facilities and Services Utilization/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Meningeal Neoplasms/surgery , Meningioma/surgery , Neurosurgical Procedures/economics , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Reimbursement Mechanisms , Skull Base Neoplasms/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cranial Fossa, Anterior , Cranial Fossa, Middle , Cranial Fossa, Posterior , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Postoperative Complications/economics , Reoperation/economics , United States , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL