Phase II Study of Intraperitoneal Administration of Paclitaxel Combined with S-1 and Cisplatin for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is promising for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. Although a phase III study failed to show a statistically significant superiority of intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with S-1 and intravenous paclitaxel, the sensitivity analysis suggested clinical efficacy. Thus, attempts to combine intraperitoneal paclitaxel with other systemic therapies with higher efficacy have been warranted. We sought to explore the efficacy of intraperitoneal paclitaxel with S-1 and cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis were enrolled in the phase II trial. In addition to the established S-1 and cisplatin regimen every 5 weeks, intraperitoneal paclitaxel was administered on days 1, 8, and 22 at a dose of 20 mg/m2. The primary endpoint was overall survival rate at 1 year after treatment initiation. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and toxicity. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were enrolled and fully evaluated for efficacy and toxicity. The 1-year overall survival rate was 73.6% (95% confidence interval 59.5-83.4%), and the primary endpoint was met. The median survival time was 19.4 months (95% confidence interval, 16.1-24.6 months). The 1-year progression-free survival rate was 49.6% (95% confidence interval, 34.6-62.9%). The incidences of grade 3/4 hematological and non-hematological toxicities were 43% and 47%, respectively. The frequent grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (25%), anemia (30%), diarrhea (13%), and anorexia (17%). Intraperitoneal catheter and implanted port-related complications were observed in four patients. There was one treatment-related death. CONCLUSIONS: Intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with S-1 and cisplatin is well tolerated and active in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis.

Comparison of the subtotal and narrow gastric conduit for cervical esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several reports have compared narrow gastric conduit (NGC) with subtotal gastric conduit (SGC) for cervical esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy; however, whether which one is more beneficial in terms of postoperative complications remains unclear. To determine the optimal gastric conduit type, we retrospectively investigated and compared the postoperative complications between NGC and SGC used in cervical circular-tapered esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy through a propensity score-matched analysis. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2022, 577 consecutive esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy and cervical circular-stapled esophagogastrostomy were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: Of the 577 patients, 77 were included each in the SGC and NGC groups, after propensity score matching. Clinical characteristics did not differ between the two groups. The anastomotic leakage rate was significantly lower in the SGC group than in the NGC group (5% vs. 22%, p < 0.01). The anastomotic stenosis rate was significantly higher in the SGC group (16% vs. 5%, p = 0.03). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that NGC, subcutaneous route, and age were significant independent factors associated with anastomotic leakage (odds ratios, 8.58, 6.49, and 5.21; p < 0.01, < 0.01 and 0.03, respectively) and that SGC was a significant independent factor associated with anastomotic stricture (odds ratios, 4.91; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In cervical circular-stapled esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy, SGC was superior to NGC in terms of reducing the risk of anastomotic leakage, although the risk of anastomotic stricture needs to be resolved.

Clinical Significance of Eligibility Criteria Determined by the SPIRITS Trial in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess the clinical significance of eligibility criteria determined by phase 3 clinical trials in the clinical practice of patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with stage IV gastric cancer who received chemotherapy between February 2002 and December 2021 were retrospectively enrolled and divided into two groups (the eligible vs. ineligible group) based on eligibility criteria determined by the SPIRITS (S-1 vs. S-1 plus cisplatin) trial. RESULTS: Among the 207 patients, 103 (49.8%) and 104 (50.2%) patients were classified into eligible and ineligible groups, respectively. Eligibility criteria were significantly correlated with age, the first-line regimen of chemotherapy, the presence or absence of conversion surgery, and tumor response to the first-line chemotherapy (all p < 0.01). The eligible group had a significantly higher induction of post-progression chemotherapy after first- and second-line chemotherapy than did the ineligible group (all p < 0.01). The ineligible group had significantly poorer prognoses than the eligible group (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that peritoneal dissemination, tumor response, conversion surgery, and eligibility criteria were independent prognostic factors (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Eligibility criteria determined by the SPIRITS trial may have clinical utility for predicting tumor response, the induction of conversion surgery, and prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent chemotherapy.

Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors promote antitumor responses via tumor microenvironment immunosuppression in advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate changes in the tumor immune environment of patients who underwent therapy with a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor for advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: Patients (n = 135) with T3 or T4 colorectal cancer were included in this retrospective study. They were classified as follows: patients who had not received preoperative treatment (UPFRONT group, n = 54), who had received FOLFOX as preoperative chemotherapy (FOLFOX group, n = 55), and who had undergone resection after combination FOLFOX and bevacizumab as unresectable colorectal cancer (B-MAB group, n = 26). The number of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), FOXP3+ lymphocytes (including regulatory T cells (Tregs)), CD163+ monocytes (including M2-type tumor-associated macrophages (TAM-M2 type)), and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)+ lymphocytes was evaluated immunohistochemically in the cancer cell area (CC) and stromal cell area (ST) of surgical specimens, and compared among the three groups. RESULTS: The CTL population did not differ among the three groups in both areas. In the B-MAB group, the numbers of PD-1+ cells in the ST, FOXP3+ lymphocytes in both areas, and CD163+monocytes in the ST was lower than that in the other two groups, and a correlation with the histological therapeutic effect was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In advanced colorectal cancer, VEGF inhibitors may decrease the number of PD-1+ cells and inhibit the infiltration of FOXP3+ lymphocytes and CD163+monocytes into the tumor environment.

Mucosectomy of the anal canal via transanal minimally invasive surgery combined with transanal total mesorectal excision for familial adenomatous polyposis: A technical note.

AIM: Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the standard surgical treatment modality for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). It is challenging to perform proctectomy and preserve anal sphincter function. In this video, precise mucosectomy of the anal canal via transanal minimally invasive surgery (MAC-TAMIS) is reported. METHODS: An asymptomatic 35-year-old man was found to have a positive faecal occult blood test in routine screening examination and was diagnosed with FAP on colonoscopic examination. The patient was scheduled for total proctocolectomy with IPAA using the TAMIS approach combined with transanal total mesorectal excision. MAC-TAMIS was performed to preserve the internal anal sphincter during laparoscopy. RESULTS: The total duration of surgery was 543 min, blood loss was minimal, and the postoperative course was uneventful. The postoperative hospital stay was 12 days. The pathological findings demonstrated no evidence of malignancy. Gastrographic imaging from the ileostomy showed sufficient size of the J pouch and good tonus of the anus at 6 months after surgery. The Wexner scores at 1, 3 and 6 months after ileostomy closure were 5, 3 and 0, respectively. CONCLUSION: The MAC-TAMIS technique is safe and feasible during total proctocolectomy with IPAA in patients with FAP. This technique allows us to precisely preserve the internal anal sphincter using a laparoscopic approach.

Modified pull-through coloanal anastomosis to avoid permanent stomas and reduce postoperative complications for lower rectal tumors.

BACKGROUND: We performed pull-through hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis immediately after sphincter-preserving ultralow anterior resection (ULAR) [pull-through ultra (PTU)] to avoid permanent stoma and reduce postoperative complications of lower rectal tumors. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of PTU versus non-PTU (stapled or hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis with diverting stoma) after sphincter-preserving ULAR for lower rectal tumors. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed prospectively maintained data from 100 consecutive patients who underwent PTU (n = 29) or non-PTU (n = 71) after sphincter-preserving ULAR for rectal tumors between January 2011 and March 2023. In PTU, hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis was immediately performed using 16 stitches of 4-0 monofilament suture during primary surgery. The clinical outcomes were assessed. The primary outcomes were rates of permanent stomas and overall postoperative complications. RESULTS: The PTU group was significantly less likely to require a permanent stoma than the non-PTU group (P < 0.01). None of the patients in the PTU group required permanent stoma and the rate of overall complications was significantly lower in the PTU group (P = 0.01). The median operative time was comparable between the two groups (P = 0.33) but the median operative time during the second stage was significantly shorter in the PTU group (P < 0.01). The rates of anastomotic leakage and complications of Clavien-Dindo grade III were comparable between the two groups. Diverting ileostomy was performed in two patients with an anastomotic leak in the PTU group. The PTU group was significantly less likely to require a diverting ileostomy than those in the non-PTU group (P < 0.01). The composite length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the PTU group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: PTU via immediate coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal tumors is a safe alternative to the current sphincter-preserving ULAR with diverting ileostomy for patients who wish to avoid a stoma.

Clinical significance of intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with systemic chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Despite investigations of intraperitoneal paclitaxel as a personalized treatment for peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer, few studies have evaluated its prognostic impact on conversion surgery for unresectable gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. Our study aimed to close this gap in knowledge. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 128 patients who underwent chemotherapy for peritoneal metastasis from gastric cancer and assigned them into intraperitoneal (IP) (n = 36) and non-IP (n = 92) groups, based on the use of intraperitoneal paclitaxel plus systemic chemotherapy. RESULTS: Disease control rates were 94% and 69% in the IP and non-IP groups, respectively, with the former having a significantly higher tumor response rate than the latter (p < 0.01). The median survival times in the IP and non-IP groups were 665 and 359 days, respectively, with the former having significantly better prognosis than the latter (p = 0.02). Fifteen (42%) and sixteen (17%) patients underwent conversion surgery after chemotherapy in the IP and non-IP groups, respectively, with the former having a significantly higher conversion surgery induction rate than the latter (p < 0.01). Although the prognosis of the conversion surgery group was significantly better than that of the non-conversion surgery group (p < 0.01), there was no significant difference in prognosis between patients in the IP and non-IP groups who underwent conversion surgery (p = 0.22). Multivariate analysis identified performance status and conversion surgery as independent prognostic factors (all p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that the IP chemotherapy was one of important factors for conversion surgery induction, while it was not a risk factor for prognosis.

[A Case of Curative Resection Following TNT for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer with Liver Metastasis].

The standard treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer is preoperative chemoradiotherapy(CRT)in Europe and the United States, while that is surgical excision and lateral pelvic lymph node dissection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in Japan. Recently, total neoadjuvant therapy(TNT), which combines neoadjuvant chemotherapy and preoperative CRT, have been popular. We performed curative excision for initially locally advanced rectal cancer with liver metastasis after TNT. A 61- year-old woman was diagnosed as having rectal cancer with liver metastasis and invasion of the uterus, vagina, bladder, and left ureter. The patient underwent 8 courses of FOLFOX plus bevacizumab, followed by radiotherapy, and totally pelvic excision for the primary tumor. Because of liver metastasis progression, hepatectomy was performed after 6 courses of FOLFIRI plus panitumumab. The patient has been cancer free for 20 months to date. TNT is considered to be an effective strategy for the treatment of large locally advanced rectal cancer.

Effects of Proximal Gastrectomy and Various Clinical Factors on Postoperative Quality of Life for Upper-third Gastric Cancer Assessed using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45 (PGSAS-45): A PGSAS NEXT Study.

BACKGROUND: It is important to determine the effect of clinical factors on several domains (symptoms, living status, and quality of life [QOL]) after gastrectomy to establish individualized therapeutic strategies. This study was designed to determine the factors-particularly surgical method-that influence certain domains after gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer by using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45 (PGSAS-45) questionnaire. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide study of PGSAS-45 questionnaire responses retrieved from 1950 (82.5%) patients from 70 institutions who had undergone gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Of these, 1,538 responses for proximal gastric cancer (1020 total gastrectomies and 518 proximal gastrectomies [PGs]) were examined. RESULTS: PG significantly and favorably affected four main outcome measures (MOMs): elderly affected 10 MOMs, male sex affected 4 MOMs, longer postoperative period affected 8 MOMs, preservation of the vagus nerve affected 1 MOM, adjuvant chemotherapy affected 1 MOM, clinical stage affected 2 MOMs, and more extensive lymph node dissection affected 2 MOMs. However, the laparoscopic approach had an adverse effect on MOMs and combined resection of other organs had no favorable effect on any MOMs. CONCLUSIONS: This PGSAS NEXT study showed that it is better to perform PG for proximal gastric cancer, even for patients with advanced cancer, to obtain favorable postoperative QOL if oncological safety is guaranteed. Because the MOMs of PGSAS-45 are positively and negatively influenced by various background factors, it also is necessary to provide personalized care for each patient to prevent deterioration and further improve symptoms, living status, and QOL postoperatively.

Phase II study of S-1 and oxaliplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the gastric or esophagogastric junction: KSCC1601.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative chemotherapy is the standard of care for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). This phase II study investigated the efficacy and safety of S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for LAGC and esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJC). METHODS: Patients completed up to three cycles of SOX130 (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1, oral S-1 40-60 mg twice daily for 2 weeks every 3 weeks), followed by gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy. The primary endpoint was the pathological response rate (pRR). The anastomosis leakage rate was the secondary endpoint in patients with EGJC, and other secondary endpoints were the R0 resection, overall survival (OS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates. RESULTS: Between April 2016 and July 2017, 47 patients (24 EGJC, 23 LAGC) were enrolled in this study. Forty-two patients (89.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 76.9-96.5) underwent surgery, and R0 resection was achieved in 41 patients. The pRR was 59.5% (90% CI = 45.7-72.3). The major grade 3 or 4 toxicities were appetite loss in six patients (12.8%), thrombocytopenia in five patients (10.6%), and neutropenia and diarrhea in three patients (6.4%) each. The rate of severe anastomotic leakage (Clavien-Dindo classification grade III or higher) in 20 EGJC was 25.0% (90% CI = 10.4-45.6). The 3-year OS and RFS rate were 62.9% (95% CI = 47.2-75.1) and 53.2% (95% CI = 38.1-66.2), respectively. CONCLUSION: SOX130 demonstrated substantial benefit for LAGC and EGJC. However, special attention should be paid to anastomotic leakage during surgery for EGJC.