Prognostic Value of BNP Reduction During Hospitalization in Patients With Acute Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Prognostication of patients discharged after acute heart failure (AHF) hospitalization remains challenging. Body weight (BW) reduction is often used as a surrogate marker of decongestion despite the paucity of evidence. We thought to test the hypothesis that B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) reduction during hospitalization has independent prognostic value in AHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied the prognostic predictability of percentage BNP reduction achieved during hospitalization in patients from the REALITY-AHF study. Percentage BNP reduction was defined as (BNP on admission - BNP at discharge) / BNP on admission × 100. The primary endpoint was 1-year all-cause death. In 1028 patients (age, 77 ± 13 years; 57% male; left ventricular ejection fraction, 47 ± 16%) with AHF, median BNP level at admission was 747 ng/L (interquartile range, 439-1367 ng/L) and median percentage BNP reduction was 62.5% (interquartile range, 36.5-78.5%). The smallest percentage BNP reduction quartile had more than 2-fold higher risk of all-cause death than the greatest quartile (23.0% vs 9.7%, P< .001). After adjusting for covariates including BNP at discharge, the percentage BNP reduction was significantly associated with all-cause death (hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.93-0.99, P= .032), whereas percentage BW reduction was not. Percentage BNP reduction was more predictive in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction than in those with preserved ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic value of percentage BNP reduction during hospitalization was superior to that of percentage BW reduction and was independent of other risk markers, including BNP at discharge.

Efficacy and Accuracy of Novel Automated Mitral Valve Quantification: Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiographic Study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicated that the three-dimensional features of the mitral valve (MV) have a significant impact on MV disease. However, quantification of MV with manual tracing software was too time-consuming for routine clinical practice. This study was performed to investigate the efficacy and accuracy of MV quantification with a novel highly automated commercially available software package developed for this purpose. METHODS: Using the manual tracing and automated package, two expert sonographers and one cardiologist individually analyzed three-dimensional datasets acquired with transesophageal echocardiography from 74 patients (15 with functional mitral regurgitation, 32 with MV prolapse, and 27 normal subjects) retrospectively. Time for analysis and inter-observer agreement were compared between the two methods, and agreement of measurements was analyzed using Cronbach's α. RESULTS: Time for analysis using the automated package was significantly shorter than manual tracing (whole cohort, 260 ± 65 vs. 381 ± 68 seconds, P < 0.001; functional mitral regurgitation, 234 ± 42 vs. 378 ± 64 seconds, P < 0.001; MV prolapse, 293 ± 69 vs. 407 ± 67 seconds, P < 0.001; normal controls, 235 ± 52 vs. 351 ± 60 seconds, P < 0.001). There was good agreement among all three observers using both methods, and measurements with the automated package agreed well with the manual tracing values. CONCLUSIONS: The novel automated software package reduced time for quantification of MV with similar accuracy compared to the manual method. Automated quantification is useful and may be a key to widespread adoption of three-dimensional quantification in clinical practice.

Physiological and prognostic differences between types of exercise stress echocardiography for functional mitral regurgitation.

OBJECTIVE: Secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) demonstrates dynamic change during exercise. This prospective observational study aimed to compare exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) where handgrip exercise (handgrip-ESE) or semisupine ergometer exercise was performed (ergometer-ESE) for patients with secondary MR. METHODS: Handgrip-ESE and symptom-limited ergometer-ESE were performed for 53 patients (median age (IQR): 68 (58-78) years; 70% male) on the same day. Baseline global longitudinal strain (GLS) was 9.2% (6.0%-14.0%) and MR volume was 20 (14-26) mL. All-cause death and cardiac hospitalisation were tracked for median 439 (101-507) days. RESULTS: Handgrip-ESE induced slightly but significantly greater degrees of MR increase (median one grade increase; p<0.001) than ergometer-ESE, although the changes in other parameters, including GLS (+1.1% vs -0.6%, p<0.001), were significantly smaller. Correlations between the two examinations with respect to the changes in the echocardiographic parameters were weak. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed poor improvement in GLS during ergometer-ESE, but not the change in MR, was associated with adverse events (p=0.0065). No echocardiographic change observed during handgrip-ESE was prognostic. After adjusting for a clinical risk score, GLS changes during ergometer-ESE remained significant in predicting the adverse events (HR 0.39, p=0.03) A subgroup analysis in patients with moderate or greater MR at baseline (n=27) showed the same results as in the entire cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The physiological and prognostic implications of handgrip-ESE and ergometer-ESE findings significantly differ in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and secondary MR. The type of exercise to be performed in ESE should be carefully selected.