Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Australas J Dermatol ; 62(1): 17-26, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32776537

ABSTRACT

Chronic hand/foot eczemas are common, but treatment is often challenging, with widespread dissatisfaction over current available options. Detailed history is important, particularly with regard to potential exposure to irritants and allergens. Patch testing should be regarded as a standard investigation. Individual treatment outcomes and targets, including systemic therapy, should be discussed early with patients, restoring function being the primary goal, with clearing the skin a secondary outcome. Each new treatment, where appropriate, should be considered additive or overlapping to any previous therapy. Management extends beyond mere pharmacological or physical treatment, and requires an encompassing approach including removal or avoidance of causative factors, behavioural changes and social support. To date, there is little evidence to guide sequences or combinations of therapies. Moderately symptomatic patients (e.g. DLQI ≥ 10) should be started on a potent/super-potent topical corticosteroid applied once or twice per day for 4 weeks, with tapering to twice weekly application. If response is inadequate, consider phototherapy, and then a 12-week trial of a retinoid (alitretinoin or acitretin). Second line systemic treatments include methotrexate, ciclosporin and azathioprine. For patients presenting with severe symptomatic disease (DLQI ≥ 15), consider predniso(lo)ne 0.5-1.0 mg/kg/day (or ciclosporin 3 - 5 mg/kg/day) for 4-6 weeks with tapering, and then treating as for moderate disease as above. In non-responders, botulinum toxin and/or iontophoresis, if associated with hyperhidrosis, may sometimes help. Some patients only respond to long-term systemic corticosteroids. The data on sequencing of newer agents, such as dupilumab or JAK inhibitors, are immature.


Subject(s)
Eczema/therapy , Foot Dermatoses/therapy , Hand Dermatoses/therapy , Botulinum Toxins/therapeutic use , Chronic Disease , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Eczema/diagnosis , Foot Dermatoses/diagnosis , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Hand Dermatoses/diagnosis , Humans , Iontophoresis , Laser Therapy , Phototherapy , Probiotics
2.
Australas J Dermatol ; 60(1): 12-18, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29992535

ABSTRACT

Patients with psoriasis have an increased risk of cancer, which may be due to impaired immune surveillance, immune modulatory treatments, chronic inflammation and/or co-risk factors such as obesity. The increase in treatment-independent solid cancers, including urinary/bladder cancers, oropharynx/larynx, liver/gallbladder and colon/rectal cancers, seem to be linked to alcohol and smoking. Lung cancer and nonmelanoma skin cancer are also increased in patients with psoriasis. The risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer increases with age and severity of psoriasis. It is also higher in men, particularly for squamous cell carcinoma, which may reflect previous exposure to PUVA and/or ciclosporin. The risk of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma is substantially higher in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Biologic therapies are independently associated with a slight increase risk of cancer, but this is less than ciclosporin, with the risk confounded by disease severity and other co-risk factors. The risk of cancer from low-dose methotrexate is likely minimal. In contrast, acitretin is likely protective against a variety of solid and haematological malignancies. The data on small molecule therapies such as apremilast are too immature for comment, although no signal has yet been identified. The decision whether to stop psoriasis immune modulatory treatments following a diagnosis of cancer, and when to resume, needs to be considered in the context of the patients' specific cancer. However, there is no absolute need to stop any treatment other than possibly ciclosporin, unless there is a concern over an increased risk of serious infection or drug-drug interaction with cancer-directed therapies, including radiotherapy.


Subject(s)
Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/epidemiology , PUVA Therapy , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Australia/epidemiology , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Humans , New Zealand/epidemiology , Risk Factors
3.
Australas J Dermatol ; 60(2): 91-98, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30079566

ABSTRACT

The Australasian Psoriasis Collaboration has developed a clinical practice narrative with respect to the relationship between psoriasis, its treatment and infection. The cutaneous microbiome of patients with psoriasis is different to those without psoriasis, although the significance of this is unclear. Whilst a wide range of microorganisms has been associated with psoriasis (including ß-haemolytic streptococci, Staphylococcus aureus, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Candida albicans, Chlamydia psittaci, human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus), there is limited evidence that antimicrobial therapy is of direct benefit in preventing flares of psoriasis. Psoriasis is independently associated with an increased risk of serious infection, but the absolute risk is low. The risk of serious infections is further increased with immune-modulatory treatments. The decision whether to, and when to, stop or resume immune-modulatory treatment after a serious infection has occurred depends on risk assessment for that patient, taking into account the infection being treated, the risk of recurrent infection, any interventions that can modify the risk and the need for psoriasis control. Live vaccines (e.g. MMR, varicella, zoster and yellow fever) are generally contraindicated in patients with psoriasis on immune-modulatory agents, but this depends on the degree of immune suppression and individual risk factors. Wound healing in psoriasis is normal. Treatment with infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, methotrexate and ciclosporin can safely be continued through low-risk surgical procedures. For moderate- and high-risk surgeries, a case-by-case approach should be taken based on the patient's individual risk factors and comorbidities.


Subject(s)
Infections/etiology , Psoriasis/microbiology , Biological Products/adverse effects , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Microbiota , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Skin/microbiology , Skin/virology
4.
Australas J Dermatol ; 59(2): 108-117, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28397327

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Australians are more exposed to higher solar UV radiation levels that accelerate signs of facial ageing than individuals who live in temperate northern countries. The severity and course of self-reported facial ageing among fair-skinned Australian women were compared with those living in Canada, the UK and the USA. METHODS: Women voluntarily recruited into a proprietary opt-in survey panel completed an internet-based questionnaire about their facial ageing. Participants aged 18-75 years compared their features against photonumeric rating scales depicting degrees of severity for forehead, crow's feet and glabellar lines, tear troughs, midface volume loss, nasolabial folds, oral commissures and perioral lines. Data from Caucasian and Asian women with Fitzpatrick skin types I-III were analysed by linear regression for the impact of country (Australia versus Canada, the UK and the USA) on ageing severity for each feature, after controlling for age and race. RESULTS: Among 1472 women, Australians reported higher rates of change and significantly more severe facial lines (P ≤ 0.040) and volume-related features like tear troughs and nasolabial folds (P ≤ 0.03) than women from the other countries. More Australians also reported moderate to severe ageing for all features one to two decades earlier than US women. CONCLUSIONS: Australian women reported more severe signs of facial ageing sooner than other women and volume-related changes up to 20 years earlier than those in the USA, which may suggest that environmental factors also impact volume-related ageing. These findings have implications for managing their facial aesthetic concerns.


Subject(s)
Self Report , Skin Aging , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Australia , Canada , Face , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Middle Aged , United Kingdom , United States , Young Adult
5.
Australas J Dermatol ; 59(2): 86-100, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28543445

ABSTRACT

The Australasian Psoriasis Collaboration has reviewed the evidence for managing moderate to severe psoriasis in those who are pregnant or are breast-feeding, or planning a family. The severity of the psoriasis, associated comorbidities and specific anti-psoriasis treatment, along with other exposures, can have a deleterious effect on pregnancy outcomes. Psoriasis itself increases the risk of preterm and low birthweight babies, along with spontaneous and induced abortions, but no specific birth defects have been otherwise demonstrated. The baseline risk for a live born baby to have a major birth defect is 3%, and significant neuro-developmental problem is 5%. In Australia, pregnant women with psoriasis are more likely to be overweight or obese, depressed, or smoke in their first trimester, and are also less likely to take prenatal vitamins or supplements. Preconception counselling to improve maternal, pregnancy and baby health is therefore strongly encouraged. The topical and systemic therapies commonly used in psoriasis are each discussed separately, with regards to pregnancy exposure, breast-feeding and effects on male fertility and mutagenicity. The systemic therapies included are acitretin, adalimumab, apremilast, certolizumab, ciclosporin, etanercept, infliximab, ixekizumab, methotrexate, NBUVB, prednisone, PUVA, secukinumab and ustekinumab. The topical therapies include dithranol (anthralin), calcipotriol, coal tar, corticosteroids (weak, potent and super-potent), moisturisers, salicylic acid, tacrolimus, and tazarotene. As a general recommendation, effective drugs that have been widely used for years are preferable to newer alternatives with less foetal safety data. It is equally important to evaluate the risks of not treating, as severe untreated disease may negatively impact both mother and the foetus.


Subject(s)
Biological Products/therapeutic use , Breast Feeding , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Family Planning Services , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Australasia , Biological Products/adverse effects , Contraindications, Drug , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Female , Fertility/drug effects , Humans , Male , Mutagenesis , Photochemotherapy , Pregnancy
6.
Australas J Dermatol ; 58(3): 166-170, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27402434

ABSTRACT

The Australasian Psoriasis Collaboration reviewed methotrexate (MTX) in the management of psoriasis in the Australian and New Zealand setting. The following comments are based on expert opinion and a literature review. Low-dose MTX (< 0.4 mg/kg per week) has a slow onset of action and has moderate to good efficacy, together with an acceptable safety profile. The mechanism of action is anti-inflammatory, rather than immunosuppressive. For pretreatment, consider testing full blood count (FBC), liver and renal function, non-fasting lipids, hepatitis serology, HbA1c and glucose. Body mass index and abdominal circumference should also be measured. Optional investigations in at-risk groups include an HIV test, a QuantiFERON-TB Gold test and a chest X-ray. In patients without complications, repeat the FBC at 2-4 weeks, then every 3-6 months and the liver/renal function test at 3 months and then every 6 months. There is little evidence that a MTX test dose is of value. Low-dose MTX rarely causes clinically significant hepatotoxicity in psoriasis. Most treatment-emergent liver toxicity is related to underlying metabolic syndrome and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Alcohol itself is not contraindicated, but should be limited to < 20 gm/day. [Correction added on 6 January 2017, after first online publication: '20 mg/day' has been corrected to '20 gm/day'.] Although MTX is a potential teratogen post-conception, there is little evidence for this pre-conception. MTX does not affect the quality of sperm. There is no evidence that MTX reduces healing, so there is no specific need to stop MTX peri-surgery. MTX may be used in combination with cyclosporine, acitretin, prednisone and anti-tumour necrosis factor biologics.


Subject(s)
Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury/etiology , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Alcohol Drinking , Australia , Dermatologic Agents/pharmacology , Drug Monitoring , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Liver Diseases/complications , Methotrexate/pharmacology , New Zealand , Psoriasis/complications , Reproductive Health
7.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(1): 161-171, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37929650

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Skin glow is a subcomponent of skin quality. It has become entrenched in the cosmeceuticals and aesthetics lexicons as a synonym for health and youth, but is not well-defined as a scientific metric. AIMS: To examine the concept of skin glow and determine if it is an objective concept that can be defined and quantified. METHODS: Literature review was used to develop a survey on current concepts relating to skin quality. The survey results were analyzed descriptively and presented to a focus group comprising five dermatologists and four aesthetic physicians. This group then discussed the concept of skin glow, how to define it and what metrics could be used to assess it. RESULTS: Surveyed practitioners (n = 38) ranked skin quality as the fourth most important factor related to a person's overall aesthetic first impression. Almost all (95%) respondents reported routinely assessing skin quality, citing serial photography (83%), and visual inspection (67%) as the main means of achieving this. The focus group defined skin glow as even reflectance from an unaffected papillary and reticular dermal collagen layer, which is created only when skin does not exhibit any characteristics that detract from this even reflectance. Due to its complexity, the focus group proposed a hierarchal framework for assessment, encompassing patient self-rating, practitioner severity rating, and supplemental use of validated measurement devices. CONCLUSIONS: Skin glow can be defined and quantified. More work is warranted to develop a practical skin glow assessment tool suitable for use in the clinic setting.


Subject(s)
Skin , Adolescent , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 66(2): 317-22, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22243723

ABSTRACT

The entry of biosimilar forms of biopharmaceutical therapies for the treatment of psoriasis and other immune-mediated disorders has provoked considerable interest. Although dermatologists are accustomed to the use of a wide range of generic topical agents, recognition of key differences between original agent (ie, the name brand) and the generic or biosimilar agent is necessary to support optimal therapy management and patient care. In this review we have summarized the current state of the art related to the impending introduction of biosimilars into dermatology. Biosimilars represent important interventions that are less expensive and hence offer the potential to deliver benefit to large numbers of patients who may not currently be able to access these therapies. But the development of biosimilars is not equivalent to that of small molecule generic therapies because of differences in molecular structure and processes of manufacture. The planned regulatory guidelines and path to approval may not encompass all of these potentially important differences and this may have clinical relevance to the prescriber and patient. Consequently, we have identified a series of key issues that should be considered to support the full potential of biosimilars for the treatment of psoriasis; ie, that of increased access to appropriate therapy for the psoriasis population worldwide.


Subject(s)
Biological Products/therapeutic use , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Therapeutic Equivalency , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacokinetics , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/economics , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/standards , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Approval , Drugs, Generic/standards , Epoetin Alfa , Erythropoietin/chemical synthesis , Erythropoietin/standards , Humans , Interferon beta-1a , Interferon-beta/chemical synthesis , Interferon-beta/standards , Pharmacokinetics , Recombinant Proteins/chemical synthesis , Recombinant Proteins/standards
9.
Australas J Dermatol ; 47(3): 182-5, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16866999

ABSTRACT

We report on 50 consecutive suitable patients with one or more palmoplantar warts who were treated with a patient-applied ointment comprising 0.1% diphencyprone and 15% salicylic acid in white soft paraffin. All patients sensitized to diphencyprone were followed up clinically and assessed by patient questionnaire. The intention to treat success rate in this series was 88%. The time to wart clearance ranged from less than 4 weeks to 4 months. In our patient group, 90% rated their treatment as 'excellent' or 'good', whereas 10% stated that the reaction induced by diphencyprone was 'too severe'. Our results are compared with those previously published using diphencyprone in the treatment of palmoplantar warts.


Subject(s)
Cyclopropanes/administration & dosage , Foot Dermatoses/drug therapy , Hand Dermatoses/drug therapy , Keratolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Salicylic Acid/administration & dosage , Warts/drug therapy , Administration, Topical , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Combinations , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
10.
Australas J Dermatol ; 46(1): 21-4, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15670173

ABSTRACT

We report a case of severe lichenoid drug eruption with multiple possible causative agents. A hepatitis C-positive male presented with a short history of painful erosions of the vermilion, lichenoid lesions on the buccal mucosa and glans penis, and erosions and lichenification of the scrotum. In addition, he had a pruritic polymorphic eruption over the scalp, trunk and limbs, comprising psoriasiform and eczematous lesions. He had received combination therapy of pegylated interferon-alpha-2a and ribavirin, along with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for interferon-induced leucopenia, and propranolol for portal hypertension. The former three agents were ceased 3 weeks prior to presentation, but he remained on propranolol at the initial dermatology consultation. The polymorphous clinical picture was consistent with lichenoid drug eruption, which was confirmed on histology. The papulosquamous eruption responded quickly to 2 weeks of oral prednisone 25 mg daily, which was tapered to 1 mg over 3 months and then ceased. The mucosal lesions were slow to improve and required the addition of tacrolimus 0.03% solution t.d.s. for complete resolution.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Lichenoid Eruptions/diagnosis , Lichenoid Eruptions/etiology , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Therapy, Combination , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , Humans , Interferon alpha-2 , Interferon-alpha/administration & dosage , Interferon-alpha/adverse effects , Lichenoid Eruptions/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Oral Ulcer , Propranolol/administration & dosage , Recombinant Proteins , Ribavirin/administration & dosage , Ribavirin/adverse effects , Scrotum , Severity of Illness Index , Skin Ulcer
11.
Australas J Dermatol ; 46(2): 70-5, 2005 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15842396

ABSTRACT

The management of dysplastic naevi is a controversial subject. This study sought to assess the usefulness of the shave biopsy technique in the initial management of dysplastic naevi, and to demonstrate the advantages over the punch biopsy technique. We report a retrospective observational study of histopathology specimens examined in one histopathology practice over a 14-month period. Patients who had a clinical diagnosis of 'dysplastic naevus', which had initially been biopsied using either a shave or punch biopsy, and then followed up with a full-thickness elliptical excision, were included in the study. Histopathological concordance between the shave and punch biopsy specimens and their respective follow-up elliptical excisions was compared. We found that 21 of 22 (95.5%) shave biopsies were concordant with their respective excision specimens, and that 29 of 41 (70.7%) punch biopsies were concordant with their respective elliptical excision specimens. Of the shave biopsy specimens reviewed, 66% showed that the dysplastic naevi were completely excised with the initial biopsy, compared with 21.2% of the punch biopsy specimens. These findings confirm that shave biopsies provide accurate diagnostic information in the assessment of dysplastic naevi. Shave biopsies enable the entire lesion to be submitted for histopathological assessment, improving the chances of an accurate diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Biopsy/statistics & numerical data , Dysplastic Nevus Syndrome/diagnosis , Dysplastic Nevus Syndrome/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy/methods , Dysplastic Nevus Syndrome/etiology , Dysplastic Nevus Syndrome/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Medical Records , Middle Aged , New South Wales/epidemiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies
12.
Australas J Dermatol ; 46(3): 181-3, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16008652

ABSTRACT

A 38-year-old Indonesian man presented with a single anaesthetic plaque on his right forearm and no other sensory changes. His clinical presentation was consistent with tuberculoid leprosy, but histopathology of a skin biopsy from the lesion showed borderline lepromatous disease. The patient was treated with multidrug therapy for multibacillary disease. Seven months after initiation of treatment his solitary skin anaesthetic plaque became tumid, and he developed multiple small plaques on his arms, legs and face, without evident neuritis. He was clearly in a reversal reaction (type 1), which slowly resolved with treatment of prednisone.


Subject(s)
Leprostatic Agents/administration & dosage , Leprosy, Borderline/diagnosis , Leprosy, Borderline/drug therapy , Leprosy, Lepromatous/diagnosis , Leprosy, Lepromatous/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Adult , Clofazimine/administration & dosage , Dapsone/administration & dosage , Drug Therapy, Combination , Forearm , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Recurrence , Rifampin/administration & dosage , Skin/pathology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL